data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fc24/6fc241367f4745b22395a1ffdd0a3a2ac7e056c2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18141/1814163ec5385cb676a61d1f37d53aa16c39097c" alt=""
It is rare but possible to go all the way to erection and ejaculation without any contact or repetitive motion of any external kind whatsoever. Some dreams can be bizarrely effecting in that way.
It is rare but possible to go all the way to erection and ejaculation without any contact or repetitive motion of any external kind whatsoever. Some dreams can be bizarrely effecting in that way.
Now that would be a sight to behold!
Um, got more context? Generic questions beget generic answers.
“I understand this issue is very important to you, but that doesn’t mean you can treat others in this way. <More constructive alternative approach here>”
That’s the best I’ve got given how vague your question is.
Some people also voted ideologically, like wanting to show that Stein, etc. had a following and that people dislike the 2-party system. That doesn’t mean that they “were fine with Trump being president.”
Bluetooth has been pretty useful for me; the only problem I run into is device detection, sometimes, but once the two devices pair, rarely are there further problems in the file transfer process.
It may allow American forces to (more easily?) go down there and run their own operations, potentially refusing to cooperate with Mexican authorities and potentially messing up their own plans and just overall making things muddier and trickier, especially if they rely on sting operations that work better with fewer things going on to provide suspicion or otherwise serve as confounding factors.
With that said, I would imagine that cartels are international terrorist orgs, so I’m not necessarily arguing for or against one side; I’m just trying to imagine why the Mexican gov might dislike it. I could be wrong.