She/Her

  • 0 Posts
  • 64 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 14th, 2024

help-circle
  • kora@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 days ago

    You’re describing the entire Democratic party. Remember who illegally voted to end the railstrike because “oh no christmas”?

    To what degree and by.what pressures varies significantly, but she isn’t president yet. I’d sure like to find out, rather than get another 4 of less-than-average-length Donald.


  • I’d say the medical fields are probably going to be the only “industry” (🤢) that has a chance of seeing an ROI from AI.

    Human ability to find patterns of use in data/experiences is pretty friggin good on a singular organism scale. (Meaning humans are incredible at the intake and processing of the amount of information an average person interacts with throughout one lifetime). But pattern recognition involving datasets that are exponentially larger than we could ever have time to take in during one Human lifespan is literally the only thing AI is good at. (And writing the professional email to describe it too I suppose.)

    And that is exactly the tool that will is already churning out significant results in medical research fields.


  • I can tell a lot about a source’s bias by the question(s) they state and the answer they claim to have.

    Does the answer they give match the question?

    Does the question even have a relevant/importantly relevant answer, or is it unknowable to the point of lacking usefullness?

    Some people would be shocked to realize just how much crap gets caught by those two things, for me at least. Obviously Fox [or really insert your least favorite source] isnt publishing 100% truths, but sources that myself and those with similar ideals seem to more frequently trust, publish crap articles pretty frequently too.


  • I lived the first part of my life pretending to be a man, and then I wised up. I’ll just name my most recent moment of acknowledging that particular distinction in society.

    If a pair of suburban mothers saw a car pull into a nearby space, and watch a man get out of the car leaving the door mostly ajar and walk around to the passenger side of the car, grab a small grocery sack, and walk it to the nearest trash can and back… they might say something or keep an eye on him. But if he absentmindedly were to have also left the radio on loud enough for you to know he was listening to the building up of a particularly spice scene of a romance audiobook and … there would be some discomfort.

    But if they saw a woman in the same scenario, who only made it about halfway to the trash can before realizing, then make eye contact as they ran to turn it off embarassed… well they just giggled and asked what author that was.
















  • If you like romance literature, I can name a few, but suffice to say, my favorite narrators are really great at lending each character their own tones, inflections, and cadence, while not being too disracting to listen too.

    In traditional reading, you get used to the idea that (“) before a sentence indicates that what follows is said aloud by a character, and you often don’t need any context to figure out who said what. And the (”) at the end indicates that what follows isn’t said by them. Your brain hardly even notices them and yet you very rarely are reading dialogue without knowing its speaker, unless its the purpose of the author that you don’t.

    Any narrator who can help convey the concept of quotation marks as seamlessly as my brain can while reading text is very appreciated in my books.