With every single person I’ve dated using apps, we’d both agree to move the convo out of the app within the day of the match, so I’m not sure how’d that work once it hits mass adoption.
3D Printer enthusiast and Metroid enjoyer, you can find my stuff here https://www.printables.com/@Ddd87
With every single person I’ve dated using apps, we’d both agree to move the convo out of the app within the day of the match, so I’m not sure how’d that work once it hits mass adoption.
That is correct.
Damn, I remember a big fall from stairs I suffered as a kid, scrapped a good chunk of skin from my knee but made full recovery in a couple of weeks, nowadays the lightest bruise leaves me permanently scarred 😮💨
Batman v Superman also had a “Director’s Cut” in the form of the Ultimate Edition, with additional scenes/context that weren’t suitable for the theatrical release due to length. Now that one wasn’t a radically difference movie, but it seems to be a recurring struggle Snyder has lately.
It is the answer to your question tho. Maglev is feasible, Hyperloop, not so much.
Their Maglevs are not Hyperloops…
You very much do own an NFT you purchase, what you don’t own is the asset the NFT represents (the shitty RNG generated monkey for example).
There is no “The” Metaverse, every company has their own interpretation of it.
Yeah, but the article is about Decentraland, it literally says it’s name down in the corner. OP got the two mixed up.
OP is confusing Facebook’s Metaverse with Decentraland, the later is a sort of ultra crude foundational game engine with some web 3.0 integration, you can buy land (obviously) and try to build experiences within your parcel.
“If you eat an infinite amount of virtual burgers, you’ll still starve”
This has nothing to do with Facebook’s Metaverse, it’s a completely different metaverse lol.
And that report was like a year ago, imagine how it’s looking now lol.
Edit: Might be worth pointing out this is not Facebook’s Metaverse, but rather Decentraland, a web 3.0 crypto metaverse that is even shittier than Zuck’s version.
Last time I checked they were searching for a film to repurpose into a sequel.
Nintendo will do anything except a Switch 2.
That’s one way of convincing your customer they should treat cybersecurity seriously.
“Gee, it sure is BORING around here!”
We already had a “Milei” during the 90s, Carlos Menem, a figure libertarians like him and his followers love to defend, despite being one the most devastating presidents we’ve ever had. The only difference is that Menem actually supported government funded R&D programs, other than that, it’s the same but with promise of “it’s gonna work guys! For real this time!”
Reminds me of r/mildlyinfuriating where nothing ever posted there was mildly infuriating lol.