im so glad that blizzards internal culture and conduct align with microsofts values enough for them to skip the hands-on approach theyve shown with other subsidiaries
im so glad that blizzards internal culture and conduct align with microsofts values enough for them to skip the hands-on approach theyve shown with other subsidiaries
thats awesome
who are you
if rehabilitation is possible, there is no real benefit to society to just keep folks in prison indefinitely, and in fact refusing to accept change for the better disincentivises folks from doing so
besides this just being false, her being considered an easy target is still pretty unambiguously influenced by society’s unfavourable view of trans folks
this isnt false, but it still feels a bit off to frame the female murderer as being way more accepting of trans folks
eating healthier works
oh yea?? why is my leukaemia not fixed by it then
that is the level folks are arguing at when they say voting doesnt work
voting works, voting does do something, it just isnt a fix to every political issue or a heavy handed enough approach by itself
But don’t worry, it’s already too late: if anything, you’ll be happier if you keep your blinders
the irony of losers pushing defeatist cynicism while complaining that ‘go vote!!’ does nothing would be funnier if it didnt come with this shit eating smug false sense of superiority
sorry, but isnt that the exact reason they exist at all
“a naval blockade without weapons”, also known as ‘asking nicely to pwease stop’
i can excuse hiring mercenaries to rough a guy up for leaking cards, but using AI art is a step too far!
man i wish there were some way to test that theory
maybe we could do sort of a ‘stopping the ongoing genocide’ test run, see how they respond
and then keep it going indefinitely because genocide is bad
sounds like they need to put some pep in their step stopping the ongoing genocide then
i mean palestine not being recognised as an independent nation wouldnt mean that the actual place, or leople there are not recognised as existing or being part of a country
but also
The State of Palestine has been accepted as an observer state of the United Nations General Assembly in November 2012.[1][2] As of 2 June 2023, 139 of the 193 United Nations (UN) member states have recognized the State of Palestine. In contrast Israel is recognized by 165.
On 22 November 1974, the PLO was granted non-state observer status, allowing the PLO to participate in all Assembly sessions, as well as in other UN platforms.[34] On 15 December 1988, UN General Assembly Resolution 43/177 acknowledged the Palestinian Declaration of Independence of November 1988 and replaced the designation “Palestine Liberation Organization” with “Palestine” in the United Nations system.[35]
- On 23 September 2011, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas submitted an application for membership of Palestine in the United Nations.
- On 29 November 2012, the General Assembly granted Palestine non-member observer state status in United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/19.
- On 17 December 2012, UN Chief of Protocol Yeocheol Yoon decided that the constitutional name ‘State of Palestine’ shall be used by the Secretariat in all official United Nations documents.[36]
if im understanding this correctly, the UN recognises palestine as an independent state to the extent that it actually can but ultimately has no control over whether individual member states actually recognise it as an independent state
its a complete embarrassment that denmark still has a royal family
deleted by creator
who knew that a walking, talking arrow with “THIS IS ISLAMOPHOBIA” written on it would actually be correct sometimes
deleted by creator
you can be annoyed about something someone is doing without making some personal judgement about that someone
if my train is late because the train driver had a heart attack im aware that its not the drivers fault, but im still not going to be thrilled about my luck
criticising other countries is banned if you were born in the wrong country
oh i misread the comment you were replying to
no, the king has no real political power and constitutionally cannot have any
in fact, in practice he barely has a job in general and only exists to (?)
evidently they dont give much of a shit either way