That’s standard in Western militaries. It means units aren’t paralyzed by unexpected circumstances while they wait for communication to go up and down the chain of command, and it improves resilience if communications or senior officers are incapacitated.

They’re both problems.

Relevant smbc

Yes, that is exactly what I was saying.

Vague memory, but on looking it up, it’s even worse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio

https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14904.doc.htm

Yeah. Two civilians dead for every one militant is fairly typical for asymmetric warfare.

Musk has objected to legal orders to remove some posts and accounts in Brazil and Australia, claiming he was a champion of free speech, although he has been less vocal about removing content in countries such as Turkey and India.

What a coincidence he doesn’t have a problem following countries with leaders infamous for oppressing minorities.

This says 37 dead, of whom Hezbollah have stated 31 were their fighters.

https://abcnews.go.com/International/threat-israel-hezbollah-war-looms-after-lebanon-device/story?id=113833089

Fission is based on the fusion that took place in ancient supernovae.

Apparently not.

Only if the process is a bottom.

Is there evidence previous search-based algorithmic pricing is being used?

Perhaps if Rose was played by Kate Winslet’s daughter

I don’t need no Obummercare, I’m covered by the Affordable Care Act!

It comes down to the tragedy of the commons. It’s unlikely to make a difference if one person does or doesn’t vote, but with a lot of people it can. Which state it is just changes how many people it takes.

Because she barely lost in a few crucial states. It would have taken fewer than 80,000 nonvoters voting for her in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania to flip the election.