He could even gift himself the horse
He could even gift himself the horse
I’m enjoying it, I also loved the first one so my expectations were perfectly set for it (the same exact game but 3rd person shooter instead of top down dual stick shooter)
Civ 3 and 4 would be so much more tolerable if the stacks were limited to something like 12. I haven’t been able to go back to those games since 5 changed it up, the stacks of death are too much for me
>be me
>want to be cool so i go out to buy undercarriage lights for my car
>also don’t want to be pulled over so i check laws in my state
>legal
sweet.mp3
>buy lights and install them
>next day get pulled over on highway
wtf.jpeg
>sheriff tells me lights are illegal in county
>get ticket
>look up city laws
>legal
>look up county laws
>illegal
>look up laws in neighboring county that i pass on way to work before rejoining my county
>legal
>decide to go buy weed because clearly i’m high and smoked it all
legalstate.yuss
>go to dispensary in my city
>medical only
>city opted out of recreational
mfw
mfw i have no face
From all the articles I’ve read it never felt like she wanted to murder Brianna for being trans. She even had another target in mind that didn’t work out before going after Brianna. Just something to think about, a trans inclusionary sociopathic murderer
Oh yea the boy totally had nothing against trans people
The girl never misgendered her, but the boy called her “it” constantly. Continuing the trend of women being way more accepting of us than men.
More of a hotfix than a balance update imo
Because I’m supposed to trust MIT as if it’s never gotten CIA funding ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Nope, that’s what they want you to think. Just wait a few decades and we’ll find out tin foil hats will actually have some use
The only words I remember understanding in that intro opening night were “you’re a big guy” “for you”
Apparently they patched it after a few days to make it more understandable but from what I saw on DVD later it was still pretty bad
Also you never said why you’d pick the 100s.
What is worth? Would you rather have 500 1s or 5 100s? You already said you’d take the 100s, why? I would take the 100s because I personally value the convenience of 100s more than the 1s, so to me, a single 100 is worth more than 100 1s. Worth doesn’t need to imply the monetary value of the money.
The convenience/utility makes the 100s worth more even if they’re both valued the same
If utility isn’t the reason why you’re picking 100s then why would you if they’re the same amount?
Only valid retort
Except you’re given an infinite amount of bills, not money in the bank. So even when moving the money to the bank you’d be able to access it quicker with the 100s
That’s a concession of the premise, you obviously can’t have infinite anything, but if you could then the 100s would bring more utility
Sure if you’re talking about a concept like money, but we’re talking about dollar bills and 100 dollar bills, physical objects. And if you’re talking about physical objects you have to consider material reality, if you’re choosing one or the other the 100 dollar bills are more convinient. Therefore they have more utility, which makes them have a higher value.
The ∞ set between 0 and 1 never reaches 1 or 2 therefore the set of real numbers is valued more. You’re limiting the value of the set because you’re never exceeding a certain number in the count. But all real numbers will (eventually in the infinite) get past 1. Therefore it is higher value.
The example they’re trying to say is there are more real numbers between 0 and 1 than there are integers counting 1,2,3… In that case the set between 0 and 1 is larger but since it never reaches 1 it has less value.
Infinity is a concept so you can’t treat it like a direct value.
Don’t put hangout in the same breath as duo and meet. It was way better than those “two”