To anyone who is reading this comment without reading through the article. This ruling doesn’t mean that it’s okay to pirate for building a model. Anthropic will still need to go through trial for that:

But he rejected Anthropic’s request to dismiss the case, ruling the firm would have to stand trial over its use of pirated copies to build its library of material.

From the Grayjay FAQ:

Does Grayjay require a subscription?

No, We offer a way to pay for the app once. The app will function identically without paying.

You could use Ruffle since its an emulator for Flash:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruffle_(software)

https://github.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle

Websites like HomestarRunner use this so you can still experience the site as it was intended.

To quote one of my favorite authors:

“I’ve come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:
1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
2. Anything that’s invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
3. Anything invented after you’re thirty-five is against the natural order of things.”

― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time

Not sure who’s downvoting you, but for anyone else wondering it’s called “Douyin”.

First sentence of the Wikipedia article on TikTok: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok

Well that link is setting off a number of malicious/malware detections: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/03ff59ab43bc2bee8f2c1ecfb0a8113f5ac420d06ba266df6b9397197df4e9d8

Looks like the Nordic countries have some of the best protections for their press.

https://rsf.org/en/index

The U.S. is ranked around 45th which is disappointing considering the first amendment is supposed to guarantee freedom of the press.

But in general western countries are far better than places like Russia, China, India, the Middle East, etc.

Did they really just pull a Unity move with charging per download??

This is not going to be good for any developers that sit in that danger zone of offering a free app with in-app purchases. If they don’t make enough money (over €500k) once they hit that 1 million download threshold… they could owe more money than they make.

Edit: Looks like the first million downloads are always free for that year, but anything after that and they start charging per download. Still bad for free apps if they grow a lot without getting much income from their users.

deleted by creator

I have rarely used it.

I used it for some Microsoft product that you had to buy to be able to view the thumbnails of iPhone pictures natively in Windows Explorer.

I also used it for setting up WSL with Ubuntu or some other Linux Distro.

Liquid metal, self healing… wait a minute, I’ve seen where this leads! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ivS5Cw3eyk&t=117s

Computer Engineering is still a degree where you combine both Computer Science courses with Electrical Engineering courses.

You typically want to go this route if you want to be the kind of person that can create the logic for next generation GPUs/CPUs or if you like working with where hardware meets programming.

While this is terrible, how is this tech news?

I’ve got it running with a 3090 and 32GB of RAM.

There are some models that let you run with hybrid system RAM and VRAM (it will just be slower than running it exclusively with VRAM).

No analogy is ever going to be perfect when you try to look into the details too much… that’s why it’s an analogy.

Direct link to the GitHub repo:
https://github.com/nickbild/local_llm_assistant?tab=readme-ov-file

It’s a small model by comparison. If you want something that’s offline and actually closer to comparing to ChatGPT 3.5, you’ll want the Mixtral 8x7B model instead (running on a beefy machine):

https://mistral.ai/news/mixtral-of-experts/

You’d have to read the article to know what they’re getting at.

The use case provided was for businesses like a car wash that puts a sticker on a car windshield. The ML model would be able to detect if the customer attempted to transfer the sticker from one car to another.

A pretrained ML model to detect this is actually a very good use case.

However, I think the implimentation of this as an “anti-tampering detector” is a dangerous route to tread since there are other factors that need to be considered.

To clarify what OP meant by his ‘AI’ statement

The system uses AI to compare glue patterns […]

The researchers noticed that if someone attempted to remove a tag from a product, it would slightly alter the glue with metal particles making the original signature slightly different. To counter this they trained a model:

The researchers produced a light-powered antitampering tag that is about 4 square millimeters in size. They also demonstrated a machine-learning model that helps detect tampering by identifying similar glue pattern fingerprints with more than 99 percent accuracy.

It’s a good use case for an ML model.

In my opinion, this should only be used for continuing to detect the product itself.
The danger that I can see with this product would be a decision made by management thinking that they can rely on this to detect tampering without considering other factors.

The use case provided in the article was for something like a car wash sticker placed on a customers car.

If the customer tried to peel it off and reattach it to a different car, the business could detect that as tampering.

However, in my opinion, there are a number of other reasons where this model could falsely accuse someone of tampering:

• Temperature swings. A hot day could warp the glue/sticker slightly which would cause the antitampering device to go off the next time it’s scanned.
• Having to get the windshield replaced because of damage/cracks. The customer would transfer the sticker and unknowingly void the sticker.
• Kids, just don’t underestimate them.

In the end, most management won’t really understand this device well beyond statements like, “You can detect tampering with more than 99 percent accuracy!” And, unless they inform the customers of how the anti-tampering works, Customers won’t understand why they’re being accused of tampering with the sticker.

“AI” is the broadest umbrella term for any of these tools. That’s why I pointed out that OP really should be a bit more specific as to what they mean with their question.

AI doesn’t have the same meaning that it had over 10 years ago when we used to use it exclusively for machines that could think for themselves.

Are we including magnetic tape?

Looks like they hit 580 TB a few years ago: https://www.pcmag.com/news/fujifilm-and-ibm-set-world-record-with-580tb-magnetic-tapes