But in your plan they don’t need to, right? They can still post some troll comment or post and ignore all responses.
But in your plan they don’t need to, right? They can still post some troll comment or post and ignore all responses.
They’ll merge it with yt shorts, then rename yt short to tiktok (new) then separate the two again and then shut down tiktok and 1 year later yt shorts as well.
oh, I love how that looks. Such a clean UI.
I like the browser, but I liked it more when they where focussing more on the browser itself instead of the AI stuff they’ve been doing recently.
I like the features, but no way that it’s going to stay free.
Think you responded to the wrong comment.
Sorry, I don’t completely get what you mean with this sentence
If something was pulled before it was deleted they’d have it and, subsequently, the deletion record too
As far as I understand, removal by mods is federated and will thus be visible on all instances in the modlog. But not an expert by any means.
How do you mean?
Yes, in the community sidebar there’s an community specific modlog.
You can check the public modlog. Unless the user was banned + removal of all comments, it should be visible there.
You tagged the wrong admin (am not part of the tech team), but I’ll forward it to the other admins (:
Yea that’s what happens if the company at least tries to make it repairable and not made by exploited people.
Just gonna lock this post for now, don’t want to start some kind of fight in a community that is not meant for stuff like that.
If anyone has anything to add to this, you can contact me or mail us at info@lemmy.world. Thank you.
I can’t really say much more then that I disagree with your assessment that our rules are to lax. We do our best to balance giving communities the possibility to regulate themselves, and the need to regulate stuff on an instance level. The nice thing about lemmy is that if you don’t like the way we do stuff, you can always move to another community or even instance, in that way alone it’s better here than on reddit (just to make sure I’m understood correctly, that doesn’t mean we don’t want you to be here).
Yea… though please don’t do that again. I will not remove this post (the local mods might) because it got so much traction, but next time I will.
I see. Well two remarks about that:
one his own users accept given that’s apparently what people were reporting others for
That doesn’t really make sense to me, the existence of a report doesn’t mean that users agree.
Second remark, I agree that it wasn’t classy to threaten a ban like that, I told the mod this. Do I think this shows that the mod is inherently incapable of modding like you seem to do? No, as mods are also humans with emotions.
I don’t see how you could think that I would ban you? I don’t ban people for discussing stuff with me.
I did read the whole-ass thread, but I don’t see any reference to comments that should have been deleted because of rule 1. The rules of that community do not have rules against bad-faith arguments. Maybe it should, but it is shitposting after all. I don’t really see the issue.
And I do care about your feeling about the modding, otherwise I wouldn’t really be having this conversation, now would I?
Which particular comments are you talking about? I thought the discussion was about bad faith arguments, not lack of respect?
So… what exactly are you alleging this mod is doing wrong? As far as I understand they asked someone to stop reporting stuff that wasn’t against the rules. You then told them they where selfish, lazy and unwilling to do their job and that they should step down. That seems a violation of rule 1, or am I interpreting it wrongly?
What’s wrong with this post? Asking for some details about someone that wants to mod one of the bigger communities is a good idea, right?