Yeah again I wouldn’t recommend it, it seems a bit unnecessary. There are a huge number of environmentally friendly vegan clothing options.
I get omnivores telling me I can replace my vegan food with literal corpses. Dead animals are definitely less environmentally friendly than what I’m eating.
Actually we’d rather you didn’t use either, neither of these things are good for the environment.
Yeah, actually I agree with you. PETA isn’t a good source, they’re like the fox news of veganism.
I’m not a fan of PETA either but that source doesn’t say anything about animal rights groups claiming sheep are killed for their wool. Why lie dude?
Do you have any sources for that? I’ve googled and couldn’t find any.
I don’t agree with that, here’s a study from Oxford University confirming vegan diets are on average 33% cheaper than omniverous diets.
It can be expensive going vegan if you eat brand name fake meat every day but everyday vegan staples (chickpeas, lentils, beans etc) cost very little.
Just double checked the definition of causal here and I’m pretty sure it is. As the demand for a product falls, less is produced.
I don’t think I agree with this, as less people buy meat the demand for it falls. As the demand falls less is produced. Kind of a simple take I guess but I don’t think your comment makes sense.
Is there an angle to this that I’ve missed?
Can you provide another example please? I’m not sure I follow the bucket analogy.
If I choose not to eat meat it lessens the demand for it (however minutely). On a larger scale with many vegans refusing to eat meat less animals are bred into existence to be slaughtered.
What am I missing?
Yeah, the sailing in Valheim’s kind of a slog.