Ask me anything.
I also develop Tesseract UI for Lemmy/Sublinks
I think the distributed nature of the Fediverse is a big part of it. Lot of moderation policies at play, on a lot of different instances and some allow some real jerks to flourish and spill out elsewhere. I have zero tolerance for any of that garbage and am very quick with my block/ban buttons, but those are only effective on my own instance or the few communities I moderate outside that.
OP, best I can suggest is to report them. Most of the communities I interact with are pretty responsive to those kinds of reports and similarly don’t tolerate it. Mods, unfortunately, can’t read every comment and often rely on reports to know when to look deeper/take action.
And don’t feel bad about blocking the jerks. There’s a lot of them, lol.
Is it weird that I read your reply in Frasier’s voice?
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/hindustan-times/
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Questionable Reasoning: Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: India
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
Yeah, I got that from the post, and I appreciate it. Which is why I’ve chosen to leave it up. It’s certainly an unpopular opinion based on the types of comments I’ve seen elsewhere, it’s not calling out anything specifically, and the message is important.
If you want to edit it to be more generic, that’d be cool. Otherwise, I’m just gonna watch to make sure the discussions/comments don’t go off the rails. When the new mod team took over, we all agreed we should leave politics at the door since it’s everywhere and sometimes you just need a reprieve.
Not sure where the line is for that, exactly, but I’m willing to allow some generic, good-faith discussion once in a while. May need to chat with the other mods to see how they feel about it.
For the record, I agree with everything you’re saying.
As a mod, I have to say “Rule 1: No Politics”.
That said, I’m going to allow this as long as it remains civil and discussion are in good faith. That that said, other mods of the community may disagree and remove it.
Because that would greatly harm accessibility for the visually impaired.
And if you wanted to adhere to accessibility guidelines for the conversational images, you’d need to add alt text to them. But then the ML models can train on that, so you’re back to square one.
We did discuss that, but figured it might be too confusing. Plus, with the federation delays that were happening yesterday, didn’t want to take the risk.
Just assume the new signage isn’t here yet lol
Lol. Only the post submissions are expected (though not required) to be Popular for today. Comments, as usual, are open season.
I don’t know if it was intentional on OP’s part, but our April Fool’s Day rules are in effect at the moment, so posts are expected to be “Popular Opinions” .
More like a parasite since it’s competing with the rest of your body for that oxygen.
What kind of misogynistic bullshit is this?
Edit: Oh, I see you edited the post.
Downvoting because I agree.
So sick of it being shoved into everything, all the hype about it, and all the drivel it spits out.
The only reason that’s the case is because OpenAI had something people ooh’d, ahh’d, clapped, and threw money at and all the other tech companies said “me too!” and threw their half-baked abominations into everything in order to suck up that sweet, sweet training data.
Not real tags, just [Tag] in the post title.
e.g. [General] Cheerios are the Best Cereal
The crux of this type of community. The popular opinion on Lemmy could be somewhere else’s unpopular opinion and vice versa.
Yeah, that’s why we added the optional guideline to tag opinions as generally unpopular or unpopular on Lemmy. Quite often, those are two very different things.
If my instance ever gets sync’d back up where I can interact in something approximating real-time, I may make that happen lol.