🍔🍔🍔

i am not familiar with gab, but is this prompt the entirety of what differentiates it from other GPT-4 LLMs? you can really have a product that’s just someone else’s extremely complicated product but you staple some shit to the front of every prompt?

Pretty Huge Dick

im still on a pixel 3a

yeah same for me, about five years.

it’s not just that i can still get what i need. it’s also that i just ‘need’ way less shit.

i think i realized i had a problem when my brother in law made fun of me for having an 8-port USB charger on my bedside table (with a single cable for my phone plugged into it).

i dunno, the premise of this question seems to me like homelessness is a riddle that homeless people just have not figured out. im pretty sure that if the answer could be crowdsourced in eight hours from eighty sysadmins on the toilet, it wouldn’t be such an intractable problem

i kind of can’t believe how long my Seasonic PSU is lasting. It’s been on continuously for the last like, 12 years. unreal

i am struggling to either parse or believe this. you have successfully gotten an answer to the search query “what’s that song that goes do do do do do do do”?

piece of chicken which he scarfed disturbingly fast

yeah kanye for me too. used to be my favorite artist, paid out the ass for tickets on multiple tours, knew all the words to his first like, six albums. haven’t listened to him in like a year and a half after the Alex Jones interview and Adidas stories came out. it’s not even virtue signaling, it’s just too much work to not think about all the horrible shit he’s done and said. i count myself extremely lucky that i never got a tattoo

look i mean, wherever the line is, im pretty confident nazis are on the other side of it

i have a pretty specific example, but i do this in the comment section on pretty much every post about EVs, because very frequently there’s somebody repeating the lazy myth that oh actually EVs are just as bad as internal combustion engine vehicles because loose awareness of life cycle assessment. people state this all the time as if it’s some kind of philosophical point about the impossibility of technological solutions to climate change, when in actuality it is a quantitative falsehood that is easily disproven with very cursory research, like you can pull up the relevant data from the IEA in like five minutes. ive told this to probably like fifty people, including at my job at an EV company, and it has never once changed their mind, i guess because again people are actually not looking to engage with this point quantitatively. but it still takes me a little while to disengage from my natural inclination to be helpful about something that on its surface is a math question.

can anyone with more insight explain what checks and balances had to have failed for this to make it to the field? i understand that this is like obviously potentially lethal but i don’t really know how this kind of thing would normally be prevented.

yeah, probably

no, sorry, lol. i mean that, like the other user i also find the way you respond to things a little strange. so i was referencing the test from blade runner that they use to determine whether someone is a robot. but i see from looking through your comment history that you mention being danish and so probably it’s just a cultural difference. sorry that I suspected you and hope you have a nice day 🙂

if you were walking in the desert, and you saw a turtle on its back, would you flip it over?

edit: ah, danish

interestingly i heard that his heart has already decayed into extremely rich bitumen. they’re planning a memorial where once a year they extract a tablespoon to light a small flame and the smoke will be blown into a cambodian infant’s face

what exactly am i looking at here? is this an open floor plan bathroom?

i had this disconcerting experience several years ago, i was talking with a friend of a friend who i’d had a couple of classes with but never really spoken to, and we were talking about technology in some context, and i made some off-handed reference to the unabomber’s manifesto. he didn’t know what i was talking about, so i briefly explained the themes, industrial alienation, etc. and then he asked who the unabomber was, so i explained that whole thing. and i had to explain that like, i was not really serious about wanting to live in a cabin in the woods, it was just sort of a dark humor joke, then he said ‘oh no it’s okay, i totally understand,’ and then he got serious and said, ‘personally, i really agree with charles manson. the race wars are coming’ i was like ‘uh,’ and diligently avoided ever being in the same room with him again. i’m not even white??

ok i work in a kind of tangential industry and can kind of answer this probably

in general the higher the voltage the smaller the current, which you’re generally happy about because your 1) electrical losses and 2) cable/wire diameter are both proportional to current

the tradeoffs being 1) it gets harder and more important to isolate the circuit (e.g. your wire insulation that prevents the 12V bus from shorting out to the vehicle chassis now needs to be thicker) and 2) all the stuff people make for cars (i dunno, windshield wiper motors, radiator fans, whatever) is currently for 12V

in general this move probably makes sense, provided they’re able to figure out their supply chains, and if tesla can position themselves as being like the first company to figure out a bunch of these 48V components at scale that’s probably going to be really good for them. they did a kind of similar thing with the charging infrastructure if i understand currently, like now the tesla charging cable is the de facto north american standard

“When you’ve got a product with a lot of new technology or any brand new vehicle program, especially one that is as different and advanced as the Cybertruck, you will have problems proportionate to how many new things you’re trying to solve at scale,” he added.

does it have new technology? i thought it was just like, shockingly ugly?