Eli5

Nvm, https://lemmy.world/post/15651976

*i have things to procrastinate on

Citing mental outlaw,

Hot Latina babe

Yeah, that’s why I write shit on the internet :D

Keep it up, ladies 🤣

You mean tf is up with bears? There was recently some kind of a social media survey asking women whether they’d prefer to stumble upon a bear or a man while walking in the forest. Bears won.

Kinda weird since I don’t remember them specifying the place, the type of said bear, the existence of cubs in the bush nearby or the season, so the possibility of getting attacked varies from “oh, a cute panda; guess I’ll just pass by” to being eaten alive by a bear that woke up from hibernation in the middle of the winter, but I digress

Finally, quality content

https://sh.itjust.works/post/18780875

That’s kinda what I’ve imagined as well

Not if you live in Russia, tho: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/10/russian-teenager-nikita-uvarov-jailed-over-minecraft-plot-to-blow-up-virtual-spy-hq

I mean, it’s not THAT bad (admittedly, coming from sb who managed to get a burn from literally everything that goes remotely hot in their possession, from placing a hand on a steam cooker to touching dead ICs).

Still waiting for rpmmie rpm to appear

Isn’t it applicable to everyone, tho? E.g. you spend some time choosing good headphones, and then start noticing people wearing specific models you found interesting, or get into laptops and see thinkpad owners, etc.

I mean, changing a const is itself a questionable move (the question being whether the one doing it is insane)

I thought of it more in terms of changing constants (by casting the const away). AFAIK when it’s not volatile, the compiler can place it into read-only data segment or make it a part of some other data, etc. So, technically, changing a const volatile would be less of a UB compared to changing a regular const (?)

My guess is that’s more like in SQL: you can shout if you want to, but DBMSes also understand lowercase

While the author of the meme seems to be unfamiliar with the concept of causality, the last part doesn’t seem that wrong if you look at Assange, for example…

That’s the first scenario I’ve heard of, where the end would’ve really justified the means

Those packets just forgot to turn off the oven, nothing to see here

Allrighty, I’ll contact u as soon as I become a gvt.