![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/4c3a6c37-fe56-4144-a21b-d492db959be7.jpeg)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
deleted by creator
I Am Incredibly Strong & And Handsome
deleted by creator
lmao exact same thing happened to me
Their post history indicates a clinical obsession with… being an asshole about shit that doesn’t matter.
Technically not misogyny—just good ol’ fashioned objectification.
Damn, sucks for Canada!
This is Canada.
Can you please explain this idea—I’ve not heard it before? And who, specifically, has designed and implemented this?
Some people are desperate for employment.
This is a mischaracterization of his statements and lacks nuance.
You can read more here: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/world/europe/navalnys-comments-on-crimea-ignite-russian-twittersphere.html
Conflating two concepts can be funny (e.g. puns) but this isn’t that. “Dereferencing a movie ” has no meaning outside of manual memory management.
I understand humour is subjective but some jokes aren’t as strong as others (and some jokes aren’t jokes at all).
I personally don’t find it funny because these types of jokes essentially boil down to “I used a concept outside of its context, and for that reason alone it is funny”. However, with a lot of these jokes the context is so narrow (i.e. programming) that they are almost universally not understood by wider audiences.
Thank you for explaining more eloquently what I was unable to.
I dislike these types of puns because they only make sense in one direction.
Here’s an example of a good pun because it makes sense in both directions:
I meant to look for my missing watch, but I could never find the time.
I am very curious to see if this will be the first smartwatch that works with tattooed wrists. None of the health & security features have ever worked for me with any of the major brands.
That’s quite an intentionally misleading headline @hal_5700X@lemmy.world
I miss the days of tiny phones. I still use an iPhone 12 mini and it’s nearly impossible to find modern Android phones with less than a 6” screen. I don’t understand the obsession with enormous screens. Sure the flagship models could have big screens to pack in bigger batteries and more powerful components—but why is no one making a 4” phone?
No thanks!
Hey FWIW I support your pricing model and feature decisions. I have paid for lifetime and would consider also using a tip jar feature for future releases. Thank you for Avelon!
I remember trying to play the original when it came out and not having a great time.