Depends on the context, there is a lot of work in the scientific methods community trying to use NLP to augment traditionally fully human processes such as thematic analysis and systematic literature reviews and you can have protocols for validation there without 100% human review
It’s about Agents, which implies multi step as those are meant to execute a series of tasks opposed to studies looking at base LLM model performance.
What the fuck is wrong with you
Yeah dark triad personality traits definitely thrived in pre industrial political and economic systems as well
The first game I played with Ray tracing is still the best one, that being Control. Due to how the game is filled with glass the Ray tracing names it all act realistically and it’s great
You’re definitely right how this without proper regulation could get out of hand with unethical individuals trying to edit genes. I’d say from my non-geneticist perspective the line would be “would editing this gene improve the individual’s quality of life or improve their life expectancy”. Operationalizing"quality of life" is obviously crucial here and can’t be defined socially but medically such as “no debilitating pain”.
I do wonder how things like this will impact existing communities of individuals with disabilities. I’d expect it would probably increase discrimination as it will increase the perception of people with disabilities as being “curable” which isn’t always possible or even desirable.
Me who just went back for their PhD
You’re clearly in need of therapy and a proper support network, I hope you get the help you need before it’s too late
What did drag do?
Because relatedness is a fundamental psychological need and sustained meaningful relationships are the best way to achieve that
Mais il est juste l’évidence de ton point
Yeah most reputable assessment developers have long moved away from shit like DiSC and MBTI, they were never grounded in science and just make the average person think ideas like personality are just pure snake oil when they are very complex nuanced topics.
If anyone wants to know about way more valid measures look up HEXACO and take the 60 or 100 item measure if you want to actually get an understanding of your own personality (note anything less than 60 items for a personality test is either not a general test or BS)
Damn I’m sorry you lost the position to human trash, I’m sad for the kids of your state
So I’m a researcher in the field of Organizational Psychology so I have mostly insight on the “leadership part” as opposed to their experience mostly in Human Computer Interface. They aren’t wrong here but the study they conducted seems very basic as well. It’s good that it’s an actual lab experiment but I wouldn’t say it has much generalizablilty to an actual working environment. I’d say they would need to redo the study with conditions of trust building as they are really only indicating that humans are predesposed to make connections with other humans and be able to work with them, which we already know.
“born too late to die in war, born too early to die in war, born just in time to die at my desk”
My LinkedIn feed is actually mostly people outranged by it and they are mostly people who are very pro AI typically. A lot of people get frustrated at LinkedIn especially because they don’t provide anything to creators and make all their money off of them.
Yeah I agree this isn’t even a meme at all, I get Lemmy is a very political group of people but it’s honestly absurd how people post things everywhere without consideration of the theme
Didn’t know about that one, thanks!
Is that not hosted by James Demato anymore? Used to listen to that a long time ago.