That’s a shame, thank you for the input. I guess I could try Bluesky instead.

Not sure how up to date you are on Bluesky’s situation, but it might interest you to know they’ve recently started doing early-access federation. It’s… not ideal (opinion), but it’s moving along (fact).

While I agree with you, I just want to mention that not necessarily all fediverse users have a formed opinion (at least at first) about open platforms, sharing content with other websites, and so on.

Some people just suffered from platforms like ex-Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Tumblr, etc. enshittifying, heard that other victims were trying to build something better, and (generously, might I add) decided to give it a chance.

That doesn’t excuse any horrible behavior they might’ve engaged in. But remember that just because someone is surprised and reacts negatively at how their content is handled on the fediverse, that doesn’t mean they were in the wrong to join.

Folks can jump into things without fully understanding them, and sometimes it’s nice to, circumstances allowing, take that as an opportunity to inform, rather than question “Why are you even here?”

There’s quite a bit to unpack in this article, even if some of it is only mentioned.

It’s a saddening read. There are issues with Fediverse culture and surrounding technical discussion at wide, but also with interactions between law and new technologies like ActivityPub—and that’s on top of the law, on it’s own, already doing a horrible job way too often, in my opinion. None of this is news, but it always hurts a little to be reminded so.

I’ve been thinking about trying to get into mastodon, to form my own opinion on several topics it intersects with. I’m a little uncomfortable with how popular it is compared to other fediverse software, considering how poorly they seem to integrate. I hoped some time on mastodon would dispell this feeling, or at least give me insights I could work with. To be honest, every day it gets a little harder to justify that idea.

But that’s just a personal thing. Maybe I’m simply not fit for micro-blogging. Really, I don’t care which software is the most popular, I literally just wish they’d integrate better. Despite my misgivings, I’m grateful for the positive impact mastodon has made in the social/tech circles, changing how many people see social media and their relationship with it.

The us-versus-them mentality is unreal. The only valid them, to me, is proprietary closed platforms. We should strive for more decentralized networks that shift control over user experience back to its users, because we need and deserve safer, healthier social networks. This is not it. I can only hope culture will improve, because I’m not sure how you’d tackle a problem on this scale.

And if mastodon can’t fix itself? Screw it, and keep an eye on what comes next.

It’s not a competition, we’re in a team effort to build a part of the internet that can resist enshittification inevitable in closed platforms; so long as the platform is open, I’ll keep my mind open as well. If my lemmy instance decides to migrate to Sublinks, that’s fine. Worst case, I’ll migrate elsewhere. Assuming Bluesky turns out OK as a company, even atproto taking the lead over ActivityPub might be fine. Hell, some of the original AP creators are still experimenting with new ideas.

I fully agree with the point that too many people act like the fediverse, or their specific brand of it, is more open-minded and kinder than what they’re trying to replace. I hope it’s possible to make that true, one day.

P.S. Sorry, brevity is the soul of wit, and I’m an idiot. This ended up as an outlet for issues that have been frustrating me for a while.

Php also graced us with Unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM

Would replacing “shitty” with “crappy” make it better? I didn’t take telling it to a five year old literally and assumed uncle’s was for (even) edgier jokes. I don’t mind moving the post at all, though.

Edit: no internet for a while, will leave post up for now and leave it to moderators’ discretion. Will check back later and remove if that’s what seems best.

Edit2: yeah it’s about time I let my stand-up comedy dream rest, among other things

Coincidentally, I was struggling and wishing I could do something similar a few days ago. Didn’t know Windows could do it, that’s awesome. I think, ideally, more software should accept pasting an image in input fields, without even the need to open a file picker. But the file picker handling URLs sounds cool as well.

You’re not the person I replied to, but thanks for sharing :^)

Sorry, meant to reply sooner.

I don’t know what your environment looks like, and I wouldn’t try to fix it anyway—that’s out of scope for a lemmy comment. I do want to mention some info that might be interesting/relevant for people reading this thread:

• The GTK file chooser, if that’s what you’re using, already has better file previews.
• Sadly, programs won’t always use the best method available to do things. While Upscaler gives me nice image previews in the file picker, my installation of Firefox hasn’t even updated it to GTK 4.
• Portals seem to be a good step towards more uniform and predictable user experiences.
  • “[…] any application can use portals to provide uniform access to features independent of desktops and toolkits.”
• Point being, better things exist and are on their way. Adoption is slow, but we’re getting there.
• …And on a semi-related note, if you have previews for certain file types, but not for others, check if you’re missing a package. That took one search and one command to fix something that’d been bothering me for weeks.

Exact issues and how bad they are depend heavily on your setup, such as which desktop environment you use and which software (& versions) you have installed. That seems to be a common description of UX problems in the Linux ecosystem, I wonder why :^)))

But hopefully I managed to spread some positivity(?) about the state of things and where we’re going.

Just curious, what are your issues with the current available options?