Are these people all paying the $50,000 fine for selling to early?
UNITED KINGDOM
United Kingdom
It’s deadly in Florida because people drive around the barriers at level crossings. That won’t be a problem here because there won’t be any level crossings.
Texas, Ohio or Texas, North Carolina?
Walkability generally means higher density and higher density means lower cost. The only reason why walkable places are generally less affordable right now is that they are scarce. If everywhere was walkable that wouldn’t be a problem.
I’ve been using one to write cover letters for job applications. It takes a bit of wrangling to get anything, and then a bit more to get it to actually say things that aren’t total bullshit, but I find it less tedious than writing them myself.
The article mentions the program was started in China in 2015, and I’m sure it’s been done elsewhere earlier. But I don’t think it’s a problem to keep talking about, since a lot of people won’t have heard about it before.
The Po Valley, surrounded by the Alps to the north and the Apennines to the south, acts as a natural basin, creating a microclimate that often traps pollutants.
https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Air_pollution_fluctuations_over_the_Po_Valley
With a quick google I’ve found that subsidies for plug in hybrids can be around €5,000, and yes I do believe that people would be lazy enough to not plug it in. I’m not sure how many dollars one would save by doing this in Europe anyway.
But also, it’s just a suggestion, I’m not asserting that this is definitely true.
It could be due to subsidies encouraging people to buy hybrids and people just ignoring the plug in feature. There’s more discussion on this here
It means exactly what I think it means. The reported emissions are way off those that are actually achieved in real life.
If we assume your assertion is actually correct (the study says nothing about the availability of charging infrastructure), how much do we need to build? And are we sure that once it is built, people will actually use it? Would it not be better to instead invest in infrastructure for other modes of transport that don’t involve 2 tons of vehicle to transport one person?
Switzerland had this up until 2012, when it was abolished because it cost more to administer than it was worth.
For anyone that might be interested in this: it’s only for certain ebikes. Standard ebikes that only pedal assist up to 25km/h don’t need anything special over a regular bike, which afaik is the standard limit in Europe. You can get ebikes that go up to 45km/h and they are regulated more like mopeds, requiring a number plate, rear view mirror, and that the rider wears a helmet.
If you want something real with less strong flavour, try Grana Padano.
Why would you take your car instead of the train in this case? If you were going to fly anyway then the train makes sense. A car would be slower, you have to drive it yourself, and deal with storing it at your location.
IIRC that’s the case in France, but per the article
It isn’t yet known how many flights will actually be impacted by restrictions.
I don’t think anyone is arguing for the complete abolishment of cars, they just don’t feel the need to caveat everything anti car they say with of course we still need ambulances etc just in case someone doesn’t understand that.
For anyone else that doesn’t know who they are (source)