moonlight

I don’t know the particular details of this plan, but the article you shared seems to focus on problems
with uranium. I don’t see thorium as having any of these problems. I’m not a nuclear scientist, but thorium seems like a no-brainer. One of the main reasons we use uranium in the first place is just because that fuel cycle is more convenient if we’re also making nukes.

I think learning linux and the terminal is a good place to start. Once you get comfortable doing basic stuff in the terminal, it will be easy to start making bash scripts. From there, something like Python would be a good next step.

This is a meaningless strawman. I don’t see anyone saying things like this.

Well I didn’t make this post so I can’t really speak to the intent behind it.

But I don’t think that’s what this post is doing at all.

It’s “fuck cars” not “fuck people who drive cars”

Obviously the average driver is not responsible for the societal reliance on cars.

I’m quite happy with my instance and I haven’t experienced this myself (that I know of). I just personally would rather encounter something I don’t like than to only be able to see half a conversation.

I guess you’re right that having instance options makes this a non issue though, as we can both have what we want.

I just think a lot of people join instances like world or ml without really understanding this, which is unfortunate.

Please re read the original post and my comments. That’s not what I am saying.

I’m saying that ideally moderation SHOULD be handled by the remote instance that hosts the community, and that the local instance should faithfully reflect it without censoring it.

Yes? I don’t understand what you’re saying.

That’s not what I’m saying at all. I’m saying it would be best if content on remote instances wasn’t censored when viewed on a local instance, even if that user was banned locally.

I think this problem is hard to get around though with how all content has to be hosted locally.

I understand the liability issue, I guess this is just an inherent tradeoff with how the fediverse works.

I at least think there could be a two stage ban, ‘no posting here’ and ‘block everything’.

Also, defederation could still be used for instances that fail to moderate, although I do agree that fully blocking a user is much preferable to the nuclear option.

I think it would be better if bans only applied to posting on an instance, and each instance/community would self moderate. If I go to a post, I want to see the whole discussion, and not have certain people hidden from me by my home instance. Let the instance hosting the community filter out spam.

What does gender have to do with it? Do men not have skin?

You should probably use a moisturizer at least. And spf isn’t a bad idea if you will be outside.

The carcinization of desert mammals

Absolutely, these corporate types are so clueless when it comes to public messaging.

They realized that it’s obvious that they’re the bad guys, and the interview response wasn’t convincing. But then to try to bully the interviewer into deleting it? That just seems stupid.

Examples?

I’m afraid I’ll live my whole life in fear like I’m doing now, that I’ll never experience love, that one day I’ll wake up old and alone, in misery and just waiting to die but too afraid end it.

Interesting, I can’t think of two countries bordering each other that have all of these.

US or China?

deleted by creator

Check out some of the keyboards posted here: !ergomechkeyboards@lemmy.world