![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
2·
4 months agoYour statement disagrees with what I could turn up on duckduckgo. Can you provide your sources, I’m not a subject matter expert.
Your statement disagrees with what I could turn up on duckduckgo. Can you provide your sources, I’m not a subject matter expert.
Yes, but your assertion that renewable is cheaper completely ignored the cost of grid scale energy storage suitable to remove fossil fuel generation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_winter
Sulphur in the air increasing the amount of sunlight that’s reflected by the earth.
Both
Wait, what’s your definition of a disease?
I thought there is no way that’s true… get your shit together Queensland.
With the exception of Queensland, all Australian states and jurisdictions have prohibited the use of physical punishment in all schools.
Might not be able to afford it?
I mean, it’s speculation. Current estimated completion is November this year, and the battery power price was already raised to 4c in 2020 estimated https://www.capdyn.com/news/capital-dynamics-and-8minute-solar-energy-partner-on-breakthrough-400mwac-eland/
This would still be cheaper than nuclear. But it’s not a true comparison. I am asking the cost to replace fossil generation. Which means some degrees of over provisioning and redundancy. The bank of America paints a very different picture in its 2023 report (https://advisoranalyst.com/2023/05/11/bofa-the-nuclear-necessity.html/) but I hard trust them.
Either way your evidence from anecdote makes it clear you have as little understanding as I do. So I am still none the wiser if solar + generation is a solution today that makes nuclear irrelevant. If it’s not we can’t just keep burning coal till it is though. People have been saying for 30 years let’s just use renewables. But the world would look very different today if we had transition to nuclear energy back then.