It’s easy to do this with a computer and no AI. Just have a recording of him saying each individual number and then get the computer to read the relevant recording while going through the digits of PI. You could have a number of recordings for each number and choose one randomly to simulate variation.
The main problem with the death penalty is the number of people who have been found to be not guilty years and decades after their conviction.
You just can’t be 100% sure that someone’s guilty - even if they confessed or there were witnesses because people lie. Nowadays even video evidence can be faked.
“Beyond a reasonable doubt” isn’t a good enough bar to meet to take someone’s life in my opinion.
Because recycling glass is more expensive than not recycling plastic.
This is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint that is part of the Microsoft 365 admin portal. It looks for security issues like out of date software and insecure configurations.
The one that hate as a sysadmin is how Microsoft Defender is always telling me to disable Chrome features such as continue running in the background, third party cookies and password manager but never recommends those actions for Edge.
It’s a message of how things should be, not how things are.
On point 2. Isn’t that actually true as long as the majority believe it to be true? If everyone voted for the party that they supported instead of voting tactically to avoid getting a specific party in then it would be true but that’s not how people vote.
But they can return to the north if they want to. In fact, they are making that more likely as we speak by making the south as unliveable as the north.
They said that he was a “useful idiot” which has a specific meaning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
A useful idiot is a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause—particularly a bad cause originating from a devious, ruthless source—without fully comprehending the cause’s goals, and who is cynically being used by the cause’s leaders.
I think that it’s harder to all be in the same time zone. You then have to remember each zone’s working hours instead of the offset from your time.
I don’t see how it’s easier to get rid of time zones.
I thought that they’d towed that beyond the environment. How did it get back?
Yeah.
They could literally have a “secret” document say not to do genocide followed up by a really secret document saying to ignore the previous document.
There’s no way that we can trust the documents when they can pick and choose the documents that they show.
They also can’t give the court unrestricted access to all their secret documents because that would be a serious security issue so they’re not in a good position really.
I like the scope creep there:
They should sell it for biomass fuel. :)
I think that it’s a good result though.
It says in the email that you can pay extra for ad free.
But “the people” didn’t decide on the deal because they were only given two choices and the interpretation of “leave” was down to the Government and Parliament.
It would have been much better to get experts together to decide what options there were and how each one affected us and for that information to be made available to everyone so that Parliament could have had a complete view of the various options that Government was considering.
Instead they hid away and came up with a single version of Brexit that got shot down and then they still triggered the leave process anyway.
They should have taken years to come up with a leave plan before triggering the leave process instead of the mess that happened.
Edit: and if this process determined that it really was a shit idea then act on that by either having a second referendum or just deciding that it was a bad idea and not doing it.
I think that the key part is that the government tried to come up with a Brexit plan on their own but couldn’t. They even started negotiating with the EU before they knew what they wanted and could get passed Parliament.
They wasted the best part of a year coming up with a single plan only to get it shot down because it didn’t match what most MPs wanted. It couldn’t because there were ten or twelve different versions of Brexit ranging from leaving in name only to just not even doing a deal with the EU at all.
Had they created a study group to analyse the options and the consequences of each they could have come up with a coherent plan with Parliament so that they’d know what everyone wanted before starting negotiations with the EU.
The problem was that nobody in the UK did an effective job of arguing for remain. They were caught napping because they were convinced that people wouldn’t want to leave.
When they realised that we were in danger of voting to leave it was too late.
Obviously, people in the EU said that it was a bad idea but they obviously would say that because we’re “sending them £350 million a week” and they wouldn’t want to lose that.
Why the hell did they think that the cats would only hunt the pest that they wanted them to hunt?