So you were lying. I never said that. What a surprise!

Woman-hater and a liar. What else will you reveal yourself to be!

Where did I agree to that?

you’re comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.

Max depth reached.

Oh now I’m a sexist, I’d to hear that story if you’re going to talk at me anyway.

Sure, it starts here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/61891

Thanks. Any other anti-women takes of yours you want to share with the room? I think it’s best we get them all out there.

Help! Help! I’m being forced to engage in an argument I can literally stop having at any time!

Lol.

Okay, so we can assume that’s a yes then.

So again, to rewind waaaaaayyyyy back: pretty wild that you’re comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.

Real incel-level take, but you do you.

read the comments

I did. Based on them, your answer would be: Yes. You think a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist: “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”.

Is that correct?

So you’re saying a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist?

“Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”

You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.

I didn’t think you needed my permission to tuck your tail between your legs and run away. But you have it: you’re totally free to stop replying whenever you want.

Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic

I’m saying you’re wrong that I equate these 2:

Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.

Bill mansplained baseball to me.

The first would have to be “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”

I’ll restate this again according to you.

Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.

Bill mansplained baseball to me.

These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.

Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being “misogynistically condescending”? I’m happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it’s there somewhere.

See, I just want to answer your question, but you just seem to want to play this little game.

Alright then. So ctrl-f of “example” doesn’t show you asking me for an example of anything.

Guess we need to start at the top to see if you’re using some other words to mean “give me an example of X”.

Yeah and I’m asking them to use their definition in comparison, how exactly is saying “he’s mansplaining” substantially different then “dei hire”.

Is it that?

What did you ask for an example of? I will happily answer the question instead of sending you on an asinine wild goose chase.

Turns out you weren’t even asking a question you’re demanding an example, your inconsistencies are just stacking up bud.

Nice try! I was asking you, via question, for an example.

Which you’ve, once again, failed to produce. I wonder why that could be…

Max depth reached.

True or false:

Giving an example of a scenario is a different action from stating that you believe such a scenario could exist.

Asking someone for an example of a scenario is different from asking them whether they believe such a scenario exists.

So, let’s try this again.

Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:

• assess an interaction she had with a man,
• deem his behaviour to be “misogynistic”,
• not be a sexist herself?

You quoted me exclaiming that I got an answer to this question:

Okay, so if the man is “probably” being misogynistic, that’s enough that a woman can believe they are being misogynistic without herself being a bigot/sexist/misandrist?

Which is an different question than:

Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:

• assess an interaction she had with a man,
• deem his behaviour to be “misogynistic”,
• not be a sexist herself?

Dang, I thought you might be done playing your little game, but I guess not.

Since you’re accusing me of gaslighting now, lets soldier on, line-by-line!

Is this the line you think is an answer to my question:

Yeah no one ever denied that.

Because that’s not an answer to my question.

That’s still not an answer to my question…

What’s the scenario?

Let’s try this again:

Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:

• assess an interaction she had with a man,
• deem his behaviour to be “misogynistic”,
• not be a sexist herself?

Ok so starting with the comment you linked: https://lemmy.world/comment/18496795

That one and the next response we covered, and they are responses to questions, but don’t include the answer we’re looking for.

Moving on to the next time I ask any questions is here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/55968

Your response was:

Jesus Christ, you’re somehow losing the ability to follow a conversation.

Why are you quoting yourself?

It is sexist no matter the context, I’m not using it against anyone so I’m not a bigot I’m just exampling a bigoted word. You’re being obtuse. Is there a way to remove the intended insult from the hard r? No. Can you remove the intended insult from mansplaining? No. So both of those are always bigoted at times you might argue there’s some moral reason to do it but that’s all ex post facto.

It’s sexist. If you need to see me as a bigot to get that across the so be it but you know as well as I do your argument is void of logic.

Is that it? Because if so, that’s also not an answer to my question, which, again is:

Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:

• assess an interaction she had with a man,
• deem his behaviour to be “misogynistic”,
• not be a sexist herself?