Well, I fully expect him to step on his dick, but I did not expect him to also kick himself in the balls while doing so.
Congrats Matt, rarely are my expectations of dumb behavior exceeded so spectacularly!
Well, I fully expect him to step on his dick, but I did not expect him to also kick himself in the balls while doing so.
Congrats Matt, rarely are my expectations of dumb behavior exceeded so spectacularly!
Here’s a crazy idea: make the CAPTCHAs so complicated humans can’t complete them.
That way if someone does, you know they’re a bot.
I should probably patent that or something. (Is joke, etc.)
It’s viable, but when you’re buying a DAS for the drives, figure out what the USB chipset is and make sure it’s not a flaky piece of crap.
Things have gotten better, but some random manufacturers are still using trash bridge chips and you’ll be in for a bad time. (By which I mean your drives will vanish in the middle of a write, and corrupt themselves.)
Okay so you’re able to access it via the IP it’s hosted on, but NOT via the domain name in the tunnel?
Is the working IP a public or private one?
My $5 is that you don’t have the tunnel configured properly and that’s why you’re having issues, but maybe not.
Also, what specifically did you put in the config file? Usually they’re not asking for an IP, but the FQDN of the site.
Am I missing something, or is this just the argo tunnel thing Cloudflare has offered for quite a while?
Are you using Cloudflare as DNS, proxy, or via their argo tunnels? (I know you said tunnel, but then mention accessing via IP address, so I’m not entirely sure what you’ve done.)
Kinda changes what you should be looking at.
It’s because of updates and who owns the support.
The postgres project makes the postgres container, the pict-rs project makes the pict-rs container, and so on.
When you make a monolithic container you’re now responsible for keeping your shit and everyone else’s updated, patched, and secured.
I don’t blame any dev for not wanting to own all that mess, and thus, you end up with seperate containers for each service.
As I’m not a subject of the British Empire, I went and read what that law does and wow, is that a flaming pile of shit.
They basically said anyone who has a thing online that allows “user to user” communications is now subject to all sorts of bullshit, which includes social media companies, but also catches your blog because it has a comment section because they didn’t even remotely try to carve out an exception for an individual doing a thing.
Can’t imagine this’ll do anything other than make people who can bail on the UK to do so (hosting is pretty fungible, and it’s not like you can’t host elsewhere that’s still close enough to the UK to be fine) and screw with UK citizens and residents access to and ability to provide online shit.
you may see your mom
I hope not. I’ve got a strict no-zombies policy, and I’m certainly not violating it for her.
Head to the lemmy github and subscribe to the releases email and you’ll get one when a new version is out.
(And, unlike SOME projects I’m subbed to, they don’t do anything that generates a ton of spam, so it really is just one-email-per-release.)
I’ve become a fan of staying one version behind for a month or two, unless there’s a security issue that is involved in which case I’ll patch.
I like it when someone who isn’t me finds out the catastrophic breaking issues and has to do the cleanup, and I’ll wait for the fixed version. :P
Regarding the video platforms, the only way is everyone hosts their own content and distribute via RSS… But then where is the money in it
The same place a lot of it is now: patreon, merch, and in-video sponsors.
Sure you lose the Google adsense money, but really, that’s pretty minimal these days after constant payout cuts (see: everyone on youtube complaining about it every 18 months or so) but the bigger pain is reach.
If I post a video on Youtube, it could land in front of a couple of million people either by search, algorithm promotion, or just random fucking chance.
If I post it on my own Peertube instance, it’s in front of uh, well uh, nobody.
That’s probably the harder solution to solve: how can you make a platform/tech stack gain suffient intertia that it’s not just dumping content in a corner and nobody ever seeing it.
Uhm, you can buy dildos at Walmart?
Why has nobody told me before now?
AI generated video ideas, AI generated thumbnails, AI generated comments from the viewers, AI generated comments from the creators…
I mean, AI already gave me the ick but this is super extra ick.
Youtube is going to be 100% over-run with absolute garbage, and there’s going to be zero way to determine which content is human and not and it’s going to completely make the platform utterly worthless.
It feels like the most urgent things to figure out how to make viable are things like Loops and Peertube, even over 160-character hot-take platforms or link aggregation or whatever, since the audience is SO much larger, and SO much more susceptible to garbage.
When you say you ‘can’t access local devices’ is it just via the browser, or can you also not ping/telnet/ssh/whatever?
Uh, jesus christ, also what the fuck.
Computers were a mistake, and the internet just made it worse.
Can’t wait to see Matt’s next weird and unhinged reaction, considering how this has gone so far.
The worst thing I ever read about the issues about destroying sexual education is that it also leaves children unable to actually describe any abuse, because they don’t know what’s going on, what anything is called, and what is and isn’t a “good” touch.
I’m not saying Florida Republicans are in any way wanting that outcome, but you have to at least wonder why they’re so concerned about this.
Are content creators we already know expected to start their own servers? Or will there be a general mega instance for everyone to post to.
Honestly - both?
Good examples are going to be Floatplane and Nebula for the single-content-creator platform and the group of creators platforms.
There’s no real reason you can’t build a platform and require someone to pay you to have access, and it seems to have been successful for both groups.
Video hosting is expensive, but it 's not prohibitive and a group of creators could certainly come up with a useful platform and self-host it and still be profitable.
Now, the question is, of course, if peertube is the right choice for that and if it offers anything they’d need, but that’s a different discussion.
ArchiveBox is great.
I’m big into retro computing and general old electronics shit, and I archive everything I come across that’s useful.
I just assume anything and everything on some old dude’s blog about a 30 year old whatever is subject to vanishing at any moment, and if it was useful once, it’ll be useful again later probably so fuck it, make a copy of everything.
Not like storage is expensive, anyway.