![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5170ed37-415d-42be-a3e7-3edd79eda681.png)
Though, not the same thing. I really like the Dutch implementation for their old maps: https://topotijdreis.nl
Though, not the same thing. I really like the Dutch implementation for their old maps: https://topotijdreis.nl
This is a pretty interesting counter example: https://www.eteknix.com/running-yuzu-on-switch-gives-you-better-performance-than-native-gaming/
But, as others have said, exceptions confirm the rule.
At college some guys were self hosting a git server for a project but it went down. We resorted to a USB stick that acted as remote
and was passed around. That was awesome to see, for about a day…
Thought it was a good opportunity to potentionally learn something new. Seems to have worked out.
I’d change
My neighbour is. I hear the boot sound about once a week. No idea what he’s using it for, but I hope it’s not connected to his network.
I’d say a battery is at least something that should be “chargeable”, either one time or rechargeable. I dont think you can use solar cells to store energy back into the sun.
Not saying that my definition does work for the dirt fuel cell, talked about in the article, though.
Lemmy
First! And I actually did quite poor…
It seems like ChatGPT can write, but from what I’ve understood about the technology it always sounded more like it was taught to “speak”. Not with sounds obviously, but the sentences are build without necessarily knowing all characters that make it up, like children do with speech before learning to write.
I’m not a researcher on the topic, so I could’ve interpreted something wrong. I’d like to see Cunningham’s law proven right, if I did!
I thought this was a pretty good in-depth explanation of the infinite case and the finite case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTsRGQj6VT4
That’s Sudan underneath Egypt, right? Never knew they have a “white” population. Actually, I still don’t know that.
Interestingly, as ChatGPT might be trained on these ELI5 questions and as a result they are asked more infrequently, it might get worse over time or out of date on these types of questions by its own doing. I especially wonder how bad this influence will get on subjects that you’d normally search stackoverflow for.
You might share a split brain with me. I had this exact thought, but decided to leave it out of my comment.
Can recommend the video from cgpgrey on it to anyone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfYbgdo8e-8
I wonder if internally the emoji’s are added through a different mechanism that doesn’t pick up the original request. E.g. another LLM thread that has the instruction “Is this apologetic? If it is, answer with exactly one emoji.” After this emoji has been forcefully added, the LLM thread that got the original request is trying to reason why the emoji would be there, resulting in more apologies and trolling behaviour.
Can’t really blame him for not knowing an alternative without providing an alternative.
Just thinking. Maybe there’s a non linear relation between the uptake and the amount of alcohol. As for other products, they usually have a nutritional information table per 100g that you can thus read as percentages.
As an alternative approach you can look into ansible. As opposed to making a system backup you can define your system configuration as code that you can redeploy with it.
It’s been a while since I’ve watched it myself, but remember them going into the ownership structure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNZy603as5w
There’s basically no way for them to not make it a subscription model.