That would mean admitting they did something wrong, which is impossible for these ghouls.

Wish they’d pray for forgiveness because then that would mean admitting mistakes.

The new talking point is that man made climate change is real but burning oil isn’t causing the world to warm. But that does mean we can geoengineer our climate to be cooler. 🙃

If you think critics of wokeness are wrong, then show why. Don’t just insult them and pretend that counts as insight.

Why would someone take the time to explain something to someone arguing in bad faith? Sounds like a foolish endeavor.

I’ll leave you with the words from OP elsewhere in this thread because it equally applies to you:

Thanks, but I didn’t ask that and your assertion is based on your own bias/opinion

Yes I had an inflammatory response. I honestly don’t perceive OP as making a good faith argument when they say “negative effects of wokeness”. It’s a thought terminating cliche.

Okay then, swap out AI with wokeness, it still doesn’t come to the level of a “worldview”. It is still an observation.

everyone who disagrees with my worldview is a bot

I hardly consider my opinion on AI a “worldview”. It is an observation that generative AI use in decision making and creativity reduces cognitive activity. Yes I asked OP to disprove me in an “ad-hominem” manner though. I guess we violently agree on that?

Not really… AI bots are bad at providing value because they have no values and don’t understand context. You can deliver a scathing reproach that has value as long as it fits the context and reflects your values. But do you consider your response an ad-hominem?

You are right in that I never answered the question asked. However, I would not say the conversation is a nonstarter, I asked you a question and you answered it well. That sounds like a discussion to me…

You never replied to the question in the post.

I think you might be hallucinating.

Seriously. Men are perceived as dangerous by default and that influences how we think about solving problems.

What is your intention with this response? Do you expect me to suddenly give you something you value as a response? That would be silly based on the conversation this far.

How is your response any different than what you are complaining about?

Edit: this is rhetorical, I am actually not interested in a response. Oh the irony.

I’m not even from the Lemmy world instance. I’m from the instance that specifically rails against AI slop. Thank you for being silly.

I’m convinced people railing against wokeness are just AI bots at this point. OP, can you prove you are not a stochastic parrot without saying something silly?

It sounds like the state won.

So Caeser can take the money and kill Christians with it instead? I’m not sure you’re making the point you think you’re making.

Jesus literally said to pay your taxes. What is a tax other that forced redistribution?

Live by the sword, die by the sword. We let Gazan children die because of who their parents voted for. I’m not saying two wrong make a right but that doing what is right starts with us.

I wonder how much of it is vibe coded at this point…