Yes, because a targeted strike at clearly marked journalists on foreign soil is basically a stray bullet anyway.
Yes, because a targeted strike at clearly marked journalists on foreign soil is basically a stray bullet anyway.
Have you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia?
The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.
Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They’re also a core component of how YouTube makes money.
It’s also just often completely inaccurate. The standards it uses to cite works make them pretty much useless: any good information on Wikipedia is on there by accident.
The ICC is toothless.