• Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes. It is not about Elon. It’s about the doomed nature of BEVs. Any technology that can give you a £17,000 repair bill just because it is wet means it is not a viable technology. Though it’s sad that people have been fooled by Elon’s bullshit about his companies. Which is why stories like this come up. Ultimately, BEVs are dead-end and this cannot be changed. It will be a matter of when BEVs are abandoned in the marketplace, not if.

    EDIT: Again, no amount of lying to yourself will change reality. BEVs are a dead-end and always will be.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        A fuel cell stack has a few hundred dollars worth of platinum. The rest is just conventional materials like steel or plastic. Not very expensive. The whole stack is very small too, weighing just 50kg for an average car.

        So with mass production, it will be less than a combustion engine. You’ll get more savings by getting rid of the transmission and catalytic convertor. You pencil out the cost, and going with “first principles,” the whole vehicle will be the same or less than a conventional ICE car.

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, and an EV battery has a few hundreds of dollars worth of materials in it too, but somehow they’re always going to be tens of thousands of dollars and fuel cells will get cheaper due to mass production?

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Actually no. It has thousands of dollars of raw materials in it. That’s why BEVs can’t go behind a certain cost floor. But FCEVs can.