Helping Ukraine is “a relatively modest investment with significant geopolitical returns,” the CIA director wrote.

Western allies must continue providing assistance to Ukraine in its war with Russia this year, or risk a mistake “of historic proportions,” CIA Director William Burns wrote in a column published Tuesday.

Burns laid out his case in a Foreign Affairs column, noting that less than 5 percent of the U.S. defense budget — “a relatively modest investment with significant geopolitical returns” — is all that Washington sends to Kyiv.

If an opportunity for serious negotiations to end the war emerges, he wrote, providing arms to Ukraine will put it in a stronger bargaining position. Ukraine’s military would also be able to continue fending off Russian troops while rebuilding its infrastructure, while Moscow spends massive amounts of money to keep the war going, Burns added.

“For the United States to walk away from the conflict at this crucial moment and cut off support to Ukraine would be an own goal of historic proportions,” Burns wrote, referencing a soccer term for scoring a goal for the rival team by putting the ball into a player’s own net.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    As in, failing to do so will alter the global course of history? Obviously.

    Why are some of our leaders in a race to establish Russia as the single world superpower?

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why are some of our leaders in a race to establish Russia as the single world superpower?

      They see it as a short term way to get into power, and a long term way to establish authoritarianism.

      They get media support in the form of social media propaganda which can get them into office now.

      Long term, they schill for Russia and enact authoritarianism wherever they are.

      If successful, both are successful long term, but its an all or nothing play. If they fail, or Russia fails (Putin will die some time), they uh… go to jail.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why are some of our leaders in a race to establish Russia as the single world superpower?

      Kompromat.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’re being paid to do so. Indirectly, of course, but I’d bet my aggregate lifetime income that some solid forensic accounting of campaign contributions to these assholes - not to mention a LOT of the PACs affiliated with them - ultimately lead to addresses in Moscow.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes they are being paid but they are no doubt also being controlled via ru kompromat