• balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let me get this right: your argument is that she needs the private jets because she has a large entourage and likes to take her cats with her?

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      The argument is “if the plane is full of people it’s different than a CEO going for a joyride alone or with his wife only”.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Full of people… Who only need to be there because of her.

        This is like arguing it’s more efficient to put wheels on your house and drive it to work every day

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        That doesn’t seem like a relevant difference. She chose to bring the entourage and the cats. If the CEO chooses to bring some friends along are we cool with his carbon footprint all of a sudden?

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          She performs with the entourage. She needs the roadies, the dancers etc. If a CEO brought their workers for a job, then yeah, I’m cool with his “carbon footprint”.