Today I had a Bible verse on my Masto timeline. And I know I shouldn’t care, but it made me so angry. Like the verse itself was nice and all, no doubt. But holy fuck. You can find so much bullshit in that book. Why don’t you quote that? You can’t just cherry pick the quotes you like best.

I can’t also go around and just quote random passages from Mein Kampf because they sound nice without the context.

I hate that so much. I always need to refrain from dropping Leviticus 21:18-21 or Timothy 2:12 or some other bullshit in the replies.

Sorry for the rant. Just needed to let it out somewhere.

  • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I find it hilariously astute when intelligent people come back at ‘em by quoting the fucked-up parts of the Bible. Makes Christians’ do a double-take. (Or not. Cuz of the way they are.)

  • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    You can’t just cherry-pick the quotes you like best

    The whole religion is just picking the quotes you like.

    Christianity is a lot like a fandom. If I say something like “We were going to Canada for some french fries and gravy,” or “I’m gonna pistolwhip the next guy who says shenanigans,” anyone who likes Super Troopers will giggle a little and we’ll be able to bond a little over that. Evangelicals are like people who only want to quote Farva… but like, aren’t in on the joke and think the things he says are funny in the same way.

    • OddFed@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, the difference is that the bible is heavily bigoted. It’s not a “fun recreational franchise”.

  • Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think this kind of thing is partially what drew me to Daoism. The daodejing, as religious/philosophical texts go, has 2 major things going for it. 1) very quotable but almost no outright bad or evil advice, and 2) it’s short!

    Ah but every religion has negative and positive aspects, every text even, and can be cherry-picked from (and kind of has to be). That’s what any quotation is, though I would agree that a well-chosen quote should represent the overall text. With a book as varied and long as the Bible, I think people who even have read it probably construct a throughline that appeals to their existing views and then dismiss the rest as outdated, irrelevant, or perhaps they just allow it to slip past their minds.

    For daoism, there’s the cult-like immortality stuff, along with a fair bit of mystical healing woo in general. I personally dismiss a lot of latter stuff as not getting it, and focus on just the daodejing.

    Ah but then there’s the yijing (I-Ching) which is older and has lots to say about lot’s of things, haha. And so many people have so many interpretations of it. I suppose it doesn’t carry the same fervent degree of “this book is infallible because God wrote it” that the Bible does though, which makes selective reading less of a material issue.

    Well, that’s enough rambling for now. Tldr, uhhh, I don’t think I really had a point to make!

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      @CodexArcanum I think the negative side of daoism is probably things like The Art of War. The bible is a collection of texts from different periods; if we made one for daoism it would definitely contain that.

  • Mighty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    ah yes. and the first comment i see here is someone quoting the bible. i guess nobody understands the bible. because all I see on my feed is people cherry-picking the bible to prove how bad it is. and that’s the same BS

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        How is that related to the comment you replied to? They weren’t saying anything about tolerance.

        • OddFed@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          So, the original comment said it’s equally wrong to cherry-pick the negatives. These negatives and positives almost exclusively revolve around tolerance. The Bible is racist, antisemitic, ableist, homophobe, transphobe, etc. All of these topics are “tolerance” related. On the other hand, you have bible verses that teach us to be tolerant. And these are the ones that theists mostly quote. That’s precisely the pinnacle of the tolerance paradox. It’s exactly the fallacy of the horseshoe theory.

          Maybe this image explains it better: An infographic explaining the tolerance paradox.

          If we pretend that the Bible is “good”, because we tolerate the intolerant sections, we are not in a neutral position. We would rather have a power balance that pushes intolerance.

          • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            Are you seriously comparing religions to Nazism? Wtf. We “tolerate” uncomfortable BOOKS all the time, that’s part of what makes literature nuanced and worth analyzing. Yes people cherry pick quotes from the Bible, like they do for… Everthing? Every book, every person, every event is quoted with the bias and intent for whoever is quoting it.