• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Perhaps that was the historical perspective, but that doesn’t include Jesus definitely performing miracles either. In the perspective where he does do miracles, a.k.a. the Bible, at least according to Christianity.com (which sources itself inline to the bible) a ton of priests and people were angered by Jesus’s claim of being the messiah and son of God. They then invented a bunch of insurrection charges and took to the local governor, who initially refused but went through when they basically threatened to get him fired by questioning his loyalty.

    So, I guess I stand corrected that it was not the Romans but the existing religion.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Of fucking course the website of the religion dedicated to worshipping a dead Jewish carpenter is going to say he definitely performed miracles. Dude… we don’t have any actual proof of him doing so though, just attestations from people who either worshipped him or claims from people who stand to benefit from the story being true

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think you should reread what I said. In the very first sentence I doubt that what transpired in history was Jesus performing miracles.