• nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    anyone who buys an SUV is a stupid fucker. there are other types of cars that have just as much unnecessary seat space in them. if you bought an SUV I’m talking directly to you and I’m calling you an idiot to your face. on the internet.

    • mob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My Ford Taurus isn’t going to get into the Uintas or Wasatch range. Getting rid of my SUV will really hurt my wifes ability to release rehabilitated animals.

      But, I don’t want to be a stupid fucker. What should I get after I get rid of my SUV?

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Subaru hatchbacks are great off road and have about the same capacity as most SUVs.

        • ur_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          100% agree. I’m a handyman and drive an outback. People are usually surprised when I open the hatch and it’s full of my tool boxes.

        • mob@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty low clearance but maybe we can get some beavers in there.

          I was being snarky originally but you could have a point there.

          • gulasch_hanuta@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are literally the only reason they should exist. One does not need such a car in suburbs or cities.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just require a commercial license/insurance for vehicles that large (and up)

              You’ll have a lot less people who don’t need them

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The older (until 2003 ish) Impreza can hold a whole ass washer/dryer/oven/dishwasher in the back no issue then they made it too round. I remember helping someone move and they had a stupid “truck” but could not get the bed cover off so me and my snoopy looking car moved all the appliances (3 trips) while the “truck” moved boxes and flat furniture.

            Edit to add:

            If you want to have a better chance at offroad with a subaru invest in a good skidplate and if really needed they have a higher clearance model. I have been places in them that the brodozers get stuck in seconds.

      • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even an older model SUV like a Honda CRV will take up a lot less space than its modern counterpart. Station wagons can be sexy too if that’s your style.

        • GreenM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t let me start about my station wagon. I can get them back seats perfectly horizontal connecting the back space with middle and it makes comfy double bed. Not to mention that under the floor there are tons of storage spaces to keep all the tools and food or whatever out of the way.

        • mob@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Emissions make sense to me, but does conserving space actually matter?

      • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        While parent is extreme and minimizes that some people have legitimate needs… You do raise another interesting point… You have an SUV and a Fullsize Sedan. I’m sure you have your reasons but it’s an amusing anecdote.

        • mob@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          yeah. turns out animal rehibition isn’t very profitable and I wasn’t really expecting to end up in a responsible/respectable life. We bought what we could afford.

          I take my electric skateboard to school when I can(weather permitting) , but I will choose shitty emissions for a 10-50 mile drive to save an animals life over letting it die or live in a cage. and honestly, I am only going to school to get money to expand the rehabilitation… I will try to get a vehicle that is better for the environment when I can afford it though.

      • bigschnitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A station wagon is easier for moving animals, more space than a small SUV - it’s lower to the ground (huge plus if you have to lift them in, easier for them if you are leading them up a portable ramp).

        The trade off is you can’t do soft sand, cross deeper streams etc, but IMO animals don’t need to be released far off track, to me it’s worth the trade off.

      • GreenM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        People driving heavy terrain in wilderness around here use jeeps and jeep like cars. Even US army used use them back in the day before monster trucks became a thing.

            • mob@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think I agree. Pretty sure a 2 door jeep is still a sport utility vehicle

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I am not a jeep fan but I don’t think I can put a 2 door YJ in the same category as say an escalade. We need to make trains and smaller cars cool again.

      • bad_alloc@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are a lot more efficient in their class and might convince some ICE drivers to switch. Their range tends to be quite good. Unfortunately they have drawbacks:

        • They require a very large battery. If you don’t find >150kW chargers, you’ll be waiting a long time
        • More batteries per car = worse environmental impact from production
        • Road degradation grows by the fourth power w.r.t. vehicle weight. The big batteries make electric SUVs very heavy
        • SUVs are more dangerous for pedestrians due to their size
        • In a crash SUVs deliver much more energy, killing more people.
      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        it’s a fucking stupid piece of shit for the same reason the other ones are pieces of shit. you think electricity is magic or something? like it comes free out of God’s asshole? your car sucks ass you fell for a scam

        • buzz86us@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It comes from the same ball of gases in the sky that you apparently stared at for too long.

        • random65837@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The EV fans tip toe around the fact that not only do they suck the life out of the electric grid, which they fight every step of the way when power co’s want to produce more power , especially nuclear which is as clean as it gets, but that the lithium batteries are incredibly toxic and can’t be recycled. Same goes for the off the chart levels of toxicity that comes from solar panels which dont live long.

        • GreenM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          People say everything is possible ? Musk, the step father of the modern EVs also said electricity would be free back in the day. Something’s fishy around here.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re the asshole here. There’s SUVs and crossovers (aka short SUVs), almost zero sedans are manufactured these days thanks to the dumb ass govt and cafe. I don’t even want nor have**** an SUV, but judging people for having something you don’t want is ignorant and foolish. People pick from what is available for the most part. Giant cheap ass SUVs are easier to find than a small sedan that gets 4 mpg better mileage and that’s the govt’s fault.

      • David_Eight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kinda yeah, why not buy a hatchback instead? The Suzuki being taller will inherently have more wind resistance, hence worse gas milage and Co2. Unless you absolutely need the extra ground clearance, which very very few do, it’s stupid.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have an SUV thst weighs 2,000 pounds and has a 1.3 liter engine, it seats two, you need to stop being a dumbass and sell your gas guzzling car because it absolutely has more wasted seats and a larger engine.

              • David_Eight@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why not get the i30 instead though? They’re the same car but the Kona gets less gas milage and is worse for the environment?

                Kona -

                Emission NEDC CO₂, Combined 117 g/km

                Fuel Consumption NEDC City 6 l/100km Highway 4.7 l/100km Combined 5.2 l/100km

                I30 -

                Emission NEDC CO₂, Combined 117 g/km

                Fuel Consumption NEDC City 5.4 l/100km Highway 4 l/100km Combined 4.5 l/100km

                Kona info

                i30 info

                • spirinolas@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Why not the i20? Why not the i10? Why not walking?

                  I like the Kona so I bought it. Now I have it and I like it so I’ll keep having it.

                  • David_Eight@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The whole point of this post is how cars today emit more Co2 than they did ten years ago. I’m just pointing out that people like you are the reason this is true. The Kona is literally(not figuratively) an i30 jacked up a couple of inches and now emits more Co2.