• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yup. I’ve seen companies that wanted to “get to the cloud” and didn’t want to spend any money on redeveloping their systems so it turned into a lift-and-shift which just drove their costs up.

    • Restaldt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hey hey my company is doing exactly this right now

      “Get EVERYTHING OFF PREM. SEND ALL OF IT TO GCP NOW”

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      My company just came to their senses on this.

      We demonstrated one product worked well in the cloud by completely re-architecting it. It was a two year project. However then management was all gung ho, and set an extremely aggressive deadline, meaning lift and shift was the only possibility. However just before the new year, management finally realized just how expensive it was going to be, and changed their mind.

      The thing is, our products are internet services, so we have to maintain data centers and networking at many locations around the world, and need to have the people to support that. However datacenters are not our core business and there’s a good argument that we should get out of it. Just not that way