• Fal@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    What the shit is this article? I get the style they were going for, but come on

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      No kidding. Carlson is a terrible person, and this writing is nearly as bad. I thought Mother Jones was at least somewhat respectable and wasn’t expecting this garbage.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I thought it was hilarious, but I didn’t expect this from Mother Jones

  • Lumidaub@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    After reading this article, I feel like I should know what actually happened on the show - I don’t though?

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you make it clear in the very first sentence that you’re heavily biased then I’m not going to finish reading it because you can’t be trusted.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tucker is one of the last media personalities I can think of that deserves any kind of a break.

  • ItsAFake@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well that’s not a completely biased article at all…

    I like the part where they admit they only know about him from YouTube video titles.

    I’m not defending Tucker, but at least try to hide your bias, put some effort in ffs.

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ha, bias. You don’t need to be biased to dislike Tucker Carlson, you just need to be unbiased.