• Poringo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unpopular opinion, but I left Oppenheimer at the 40 minutes mark. The main character was so unlikable, the movie pretentious, and I hated there was some kind of trial going on, but I had no context. So I left and did something better with my time.

    • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah I thought it was pretentious as hell. Par for the course from Christopher Nolan, making movies with ‘deep meaning’ feels that really aren’t that deep actually.

      • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        He just has to overcomplicate things with some timeline fuckery. every. single. movie.

        • Memento: timeline is backwards
        • Inception: time runs at different rates in the real world vs the dream
        • Dunkirk: 3 timelines running at different speeds (1 hour, 1 day, 1 week)
        • Interstellar: time looping back on itself + time running at a different rate due to black hole fuckery
        • TENET: yeah …
        • Oppenheimer: constant jump cuts between different periods in Oppenheimer’s story

        Mind you, some of those are good movies and I can tolerate some of the timeline fuckery, but it’s really becoming a gimmick.

    • Yankee_Self_Loader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m with you to a point. There were many points in the movie where I turned to my wife and asked “I thought we were building a bomb?” I’ll say that it wasn’t a terrible movie but I think I would have enjoyed a documentary on Oppenheimer or the development of the bomb rather than a biopic where the director needs to make art.