b…bu…bu…but…

that’s just wrinkled blankets and sheets with extra steps

That’s not me, though. I try to keep things civil. If you find it funny to fuck with people, that’s you. If it’s in a community I moderate, I’ll do what my rules say I do. Simple as that. I moderate because people ask for help in moderation, and I try to be fair about it. Some people take it personally, and that’s on them.

I have nothing against you or your views. I only moderate you when you break community rules. The modlog doesn’t lie.

No grudge. Just doing my job.

I’ll just leave this here.

Comments removed:

Comment: You just admitted to being suckered by someone you think is a troll -or- falsely accused someone of being a troll because you’re desperate to ‘win’ against an anonymous internet stranger. Thanks for the laughs- Bye, Felicia! [Rule 1]

Comment: >Right. You aren’t worth engaging with. If you believed that you’d just walk away. but you couldn’t help yourself- I’m in your head. Reeks of “need to win” desperation but I love that scent ;) [Rule 1]

Usually I’d wait for 3 violations, but you were trolling hard in that thread. I only gave a 1-day ban, but wow, I’m flattered that I got a post about me because of it.

Updated the comment with your recommendation. Yeah. I suck at writing.

As a DevOps Architect, let me make it simple:

With a single front-end, you have a bottleneck. If you have one domain (website) that everybody goes to to get to the front-end, that means that domain is the single point of failure.

In my line of work, we use load balancers and sub-domains to divide the work and provide resilience (High Availability), but at the end of the day, if the DNS for that site goes down, we’re down.

Also, as Jet mentioned, whomever controls the domain (website) controls the content. You can’t have multiple groups controlling a single domain. Whomever buys it controls it. If they don’t like content, they could easily block access to it.

I’m oversimplifying the inner workings, so if you want more details, let me know.

Do you have any of the accounts doing the harassment? If you would, DM me those that you have, and I’ll personally look into it, and reach out to instance admins with my findings.

Those weren’t me. I never direct messaged you

If you are unsure of the cause, I don’t know what to say. Your messages are preserved in the modlogs for the world to see. They were fairly blatant.

I’d be willing to moderate. I am currently a moderator of !news@lemmy.world, as well as 2 other smaller communities.

I’d like to see this community work as intended. Unpopular opinions that are valid are liked more, while common/popular opinions aren’t. This will hopefully generate more discourse. Rules would mostly stay the same, with the expansion of rule 1 to include rule 1 that we have in !news@lemmy.world, as well as adding “no self-promotion” to rule 3.

!news@lemmy.world rule 1 is as follows:

Be civil: Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

I’m the one that banned you, after numerous complaints about a large amount of your comments were in violation of this rule for multiple reasons.

My hero

Rust. It’s simply the most toxic game I’ve ever played, but I actually love the game (not the toxicity). I have something like 5K hours in it.

I can’t defend someone who is against FFVII. We should lock that guy up in a nursing home the rest of his life!

oh, wait…

Not much. Just the previous mod falling off their rocker.

Meme all the memes!

I wonder if this will be the end of school mascots in Oklahoma

Prod being on the line meant “I’m on main”.

Yeah, I set up branch protection, but I hate the fact that some UIs are all “I know you just want to pull, but let’s push while we’re at it”.

I do. I just don’t like leaving the terminal