Israel’s military began a heavy aerial bombardment of Gaza after nightfall on Friday and announced that it is “expanding” its ground operations into the territory—but did not declare a full-scale ground invasion that has been expected for weeks.Internet and phone service in Gaza has been mostly, if not entirely, cut off amid the bombing. The International Committee of the Red Cross cannot reach its medical personnel. A Washington Post reporter said the paper cannot reach its colleagues, either.S

Some people, communicating via satellite phones, have described the attack as the “heaviest bombardment yet,” according to independent journalist Sharif Kouddous.

“People can’t call ambulances or civil defense. We are being bombed in an unprecedented manner,” said an unidentified journalist at a Gaza hospital, according to a translation by The Nation’s Palestinian correspondent, Mohammed El-Kurd. “The sky around us just lights up [with explosions], and no one knows what’s going on.”

  • tetraodon@feddit.itEnglish
    33·
    11 months ago

    As anyone else. But as a species we don’t seem to get it that violence achieves nothing.

      • tetraodon@feddit.itEnglish
        21·
        11 months ago

        Sure, and look how many rights the most violent places on Earth enjoy.

        Big mouth for violence until you or your loved ones happen to be under the path of a bomb.

        Because if you play the violence game, you will always find someone more ruthless and/or well equipped than you are.

          • tetraodon@feddit.itEnglish
            42·
            11 months ago

            Oh, I’m sure America will topple, sooner or later. Who knows? In one or two Trumps, perhaps. Or maybe it will take 50 years, or a century or two, until civilization itself collapses because of unchecked climate change. History teaches us that all empires fail, and there’s no reason to believe that history will stop at the U.S. of A.

            And obviously there’s no denying that violence has always been a driving factor in history. But saying that it doesn’t mean saying that it is desirable. Sure violence brought us here, but, unless you’re a psycho billionnaire, you will have to admit that this is far from a perfect world.

            I’m not saying violence is completely avoidable (I stand with Ukrainians’ right to defend their country in any way) but maybe it could be that we can try applying it less and less.

        • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          11 months ago

          Well there’s violence and there’s the capacity for violence. The most effective thing is the capacity for violence. The actual violence isn’t useful; except as a means to prove one’s capacity.

          The best is to achieve that without having to actually hurt anyone.

          • Siegfried@lemmy.worldEnglish
            13·
            11 months ago

            Nope, they are not

            Unless you consider voting full engage civilian violence

              • Siegfried@lemmy.worldEnglish
                21·
                11 months ago

                All of the civil rights in my country were slowly incorporated by democratic means through the last century.

                Edit, this includes paid vacations, paid maternity leaves for both mother and father, female vote, abolishing slavery, public health, free secular public education (12 years obligatory + university), unemployment insurance, universal income*, abortion

                Edit2: that doesn’t mean that all rights are won without violence and my country had a lot of violence, but it was about who was holding the power. Rights were voted through the decades almost independently of who was in power.