mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoPlayboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journalsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPlayboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journalsarstechnica.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoThere’s also value in not basing your image compression algorithm on a low resolution scan of a magazine from the 1970s.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoYeah, there is, so do not do that and let others do that if they want. Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned. FFS, it’s as if there could be only one way for everyone
minus-squareBoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoSeems like this is a much more important than any of the other discussions going on. How many results were tainted by the fact that they were compressing a dithered print image.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoConsidering it was defined as the benchmark, none.
There’s also value in not basing your image compression algorithm on a low resolution scan of a magazine from the 1970s.
Yeah, there is, so do not do that and let others do that if they want.
Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned.
FFS, it’s as if there could be only one way for everyone
Seems like this is a much more important than any of the other discussions going on. How many results were tainted by the fact that they were compressing a dithered print image.
Considering it was defined as the benchmark, none.