• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I agree with you on principle, but i feel it has reached a point where the circumvention of the classic tropes has created a new and also very formulaic stereotype: the “empowering“ woman. Must be strong, butch, evidently better than men in something typically associated with men, and if by any chance she is permitted to be classically feminine she must either be a lesbian or emotionally fucked up somehow. Bonus points for leather jacket and shades.

    It is probably the better trope but i find it similarly boring at this point. Very performative and often with little relevance to the story being told.

    • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They also can’t have any scars on their face that could make them less attractive. Hester shaw from the predator city books had her fucking nose cut off and the scar also took off some her her top lip yet in the fucking dog shit movie they made she looks like this

    • starman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Must be strong, butch, evidently better than men

      And this writing style often results in complete lack of character development. Because how would you develop a character that is ideal from the start?

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That one is worse in my mind as baring steroids men will be physically larger and stronger than women. women should have motivetions other than marry a strong man (nothing wrong with wanting a good husband, I know many young girls looking for one - but please don’t be the cardboard that is all I want)