• btaf45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    So much of that was wrong. The last one was not, thanks to the USA. It was democratically elected. North Vietnam was 100x more repressive than South Vietnam.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Vietnam

    Under pressure from the US, they held elections for president and the legislature in 1967. The Senate election took place on 2 September 1967. The Presidential election took place on 3 September 1967

    • Apollo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The US should really be congratulated for not installing a fully fascist puppet government that one time.

      Even in that last election, 57% of the voting age population voted, which sounds great but it was 84% of those eligible to vote. Huge swathes of the population were not allowed to vote due to their political beliefs or past opposition to the government.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Even in that last election, 57% of the voting age population voted

        That was actually better than most countries.

        The big picture is that the Vietnamese dictatorship did exactly the wrong thing. Creating a billionaire class proves that they ditched socialism. But they kept the dictatorship. They should have instead entrenched socialism and become a democracy. That would have been a very interesting thing to see. That they did exactly the wrong thing proves that North Vietnam’s entire reason for fighting the war was a farce.

        • Apollo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Are they really fair elections if the communist parties, the ones with large rural support, are banned from taking part?