• Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Venues have always sucked. Ticketmaster/LiveNation are trash corporations, but music venues have always been about doing things as cheaply as possible and providing the barest of minimal services.

      While I do hate Ticketmaster with a passion, I have to admit that about 6 years ago I went to local venue that had been gobbled up by LiveNation and I was amazed at the transformations they had performed. Bathrooms had actual attendants, people whose job it was to keep the line moving. They would watch stalls and urinals and then tell the next person in line when one was free. Pavilion seating had wait service, so you didn’t actually have to get out of your seat to get an overpriced beer or food. The place was clean, fresh paint was on everything. I was at a concert at this venue last year and it still looked nice and these services hadn’t gone away.

      I’m not saying that LiveNation should have the monopoly it has on live shows, but there has to be some kind of middle ground between keeping it fair, but also incentivizing venue owners to keep things looking nice and providing useful services.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        While I do hate Ticketmaster with a passion, I have to admit that about 6 years ago I went to local venue that had been gobbled up by LiveNation and I was amazed at the transformations they had performed. Bathrooms had actual attendants, people whose job it was to keep the line moving. They would watch stalls and urinals and then tell the next person in line when one was free. Pavilion seating had wait service, so you didn’t actually have to get out of your seat to get an overpriced beer or food. The place was clean, fresh paint was on everything. I was at a concert at this venue last year and it still looked nice and these services hadn’t gone away.

        Yeah, that’s how it works. The monopoly strangle the dependent company to force them to sell to you. “Vertical integration” they call it. Perhaps if the original owners had a reasonable cut of the money before , they could’ve provided better amenities.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, is called breaking up the company. Live nation can still do all this stuff if it breaks apart from its parent company. And it would encourage healthy competition and fairer prices.

  • TubeTalkerX@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Great! I can’t wait for my $2 off my next $150 “Cheap Seat” ticket while Live Nation “Accepts no Responsibly or Blame” and gets to stay in one piece.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve received several hundred dollars via Sony and Google class actions. I see no reason why this one will be any different.

  • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I recently had to hold my nose to see a band I’ve been following for a very long time.

    The venue utterly sucked, treated like cattle, tighter security than getting on a plane flight. Pathetic.

    Ticketmaster/livenation can go die in a fire.

  • Yeldarb12@toast.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m totally fine with this. My only question is why taylor swift is the pic they chose for this?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Live Nation drew antitrust scrutiny when it merged with Ticketmaster in 2010. But those concerns boiled over in November 2022 when a Ticketmaster crash blocked thousands of Taylor Swift fans from purchasing tickets for the Eras Tour due to “unprecedented demand.” The DOJ opened an investigation into Live Nation shortly after, The New York Times reported.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    One of those monopolies ive never understood, why do no artists use any other ticket service?

    • Shirasho@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I may be misunderstanding how it all works, but the venues choose the ticket service, not the artists.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because they like their kneecaps too much. The DOJ hasn’t exactly been on top of this. The power live nation has accrued makes cable and telecom companies look like total sissies. This is casino bosses in early Vegas level shit they are pulling on a huge scale.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I read that they get artists to sign contracts which prohibit them from playing at venues that don’t have a contact w live Nation. So they use that as leverage to get venues to sign contracts else all of those artists will not play their venue

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Department of Justice is preparing to file an antitrust lawsuit against Ticketmaster parent company Live Nation, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

    The lawsuit could reportedly come as early as next month and will target the company’s alleged monopoly in the live ticketing industry.

    Live Nation drew antitrust scrutiny when it merged with Ticketmaster in 2010.

    But those concerns boiled over in November 2022 when a Ticketmaster crash blocked thousands of Taylor Swift fans from purchasing tickets for the Eras Tour due to “unprecedented demand.” The DOJ opened an investigation into Live Nation shortly after, The New York Times reported.

    Lawmakers also levied heavy criticism against the ticketing company, with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) calling Live Nation’s business practices the “definition of monopoly.” Although President Joe Biden announced last year that Live Nation and Ticketmaster have promised to get rid of hidden ticketing fees at checkout, Senator Klobuchar argued that the companies still aren’t doing enough.

    In 2019, the Justice Department blocked Live Nation from coercing venues into using Ticketmaster and also extended its 2010 consent decree to ensure the companies comply.


    The original article contains 251 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 26%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Look I criticize the Biden admin a lot but this is something they’ve actually been pretty good on. I’d like to see more/ harder monopoly busting, but in its context its a big start.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well sure but. Why not Metallica or Neil Young or Pearl Jam or Mr. Burns, or anyone else who actually took actions against Ticketmaster? Is it because they’re all gross old, and occasionally fictional men? It is.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You nailed it whether you meant to it not, it’s because none of those artists are relevant anymore. I say that as a fan.

          Even when they were at the height of their fame, they had a significantly smaller fan base than Swift does now and a fraction of the influence

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Okay, so why not the head of Ticketmaster? Or the DoJ person? Swift is not involved in the case at any level, so.

        Why a picture of her and not the people actually involved? You know why. Or you should know why.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because it was her tour that sparked it and she’s more famous than the head of ticketmaster and the DOJ person put together. People making news like clicks. Why are you being weird about the fact that news companies like it when people consume their content so they can make more on advertising?