“Wait this shit sucks, nevermind.”

-Mike Black, probably

  • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So it’s the seller’s responsibility to say “BTW I got this for free so you should pay me less” even if the product is of objective X quality?

    All these comment chains are bonkers, yo.

    Back to the main article, the entire point was supposed to be that the guy was making money by being a middle man that spent their time handling logistics in a way that made it worthwhile to acquire a thing and sell it to someone who felt they were getting a good deal. That’s much more value than “herp deep I’m a landlord, where’s my rent”.

    “Using their privilege of being a coworker of someone who is in a position where it’s more valuable to them to give away furniture cuz it’s more annoying to sell it” is kind of a stretch. Not that it should matter but the vast majority of my shit was IKEA garbage from 11 years ago.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t get me wrong, this is among the least offensive iterations of the phenomen, but middlemen can be pretty shitty in any transaction.

      Sometimes they provide a useful service, acting as a sort of external sales and marketing department for producers who for whatever reason don’t have the mechanisms in place to get their products out to their would-be consumers.

      But who likes a scalper? Who believes that a guy with an automated purchasing script is adding value to Taylor Swift tickets? Or that the people buying multiple PS5s during the early days just to resell them were providing a useful intermediary service? No one.

      And likewise taking something you don’t want off of Craigslist before someone who actually wants it can get it, only to flip it on another site, doesn’t add value or provide a useful service.