• wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s a shame you are being downvoted because you are quite correct. Nato mat be rich but it only represents around 15% of the global population.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ya know if the fucking British hadnt conquered all of India and most of the world maybe your point qould be sailent. If anything its a lot easier to take down regions with large populations, namely by destroying food supplies and food imports.

      • sparkle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        someone tell Nigeria they become a global superpower by 2050 then

  • AnAnonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe the US and NATO must stop aiding Ukraine if they seeks good relations with China?

      • AnAnonymous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pretty hard, big corps want to cut expenses to maximize profits, and there is no alternative to China prices on labor price and supply chains.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Then move production to somewhere else. Mexico and Central America would be my first choice, hell its probably cheaper too since ya save on transport expenses.

          • AnAnonymous@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Still expensive than manufacturing in China, I didn’t have the exact number but the only god big capitalists obey it’s money. Even Apple manufactures its products in China, if Apple does so there is no other viable option to maximize profits.

            Edit: I can’t predict the future but as I see it, big uncontrolled corps greedy will have big consequences in the future.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              And how much of that is actual price versus, subsidized price? China has a geopolitical interest in maintaining the status qou, but based of the gradual shift towards places like Vietnam I suspect the only reason its still cheaper in China is subsidies. And well I dont factor that into my math, mostly cause its a soft factor that can be eliminated.