![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0267de70-26d8-4b9b-a641-eef972344ada.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb9cfeb5-4eb5-4b1b-a75c-8d9e04c3f856.png)
I love masonry view. This is the first web app I have see, that is closers to Sync for Lemmy.
Thank you.
I love masonry view. This is the first web app I have see, that is closers to Sync for Lemmy.
Thank you.
My strategy is to vote for the party I disagree least with.
Why limit one self to only one side, when you can play both?
Can the world please chill out.
Depending on the price I would like to use to replace my Synology, I will strip os and run standard Debian.
Sadly is very hard to repurpose an Synology.
Is this not similar to the Android Java interface?
It can show Markdown and have preview of markdown.
It have highlighting of Markdown, but is not editor similar to Sync for lemmy.
Privat gitea server.
HDMI 2.1cspecs are closed source.
Vaultwarden is a lightweight server of bitwarden.
Alternative implementation of the Bitwarden server API written in Rust and compatible with upstream Bitwarden clients*, perfect for self-hosted deployment where running the official resource-heavy service might not be ideal.
Server side is more complex. So for serverside you will be hard to find non docker og non manual installasion.
Bitwarden have deb and rpm support.
BTRFS is currently not Journaling
Qu Wenruo did a write up on some of the edge cases. Partial write being one of them.
I run BTRFS my self.
And I agree BTRFS , is superior.
Yes both BTRFS and Ext4 are vulnerable to unplanned powerloss when writes are in flight. Commonly knows as a write hole.
For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.
This will also happen to Ext4. You just wouldn’t know it.
I used to feel opening a Quora page was okay, and useful.
No i dread opening a Quora page. You get spammed by “do you like to login with Google”. There is a AI bot on top, befor the top replay. There is a AD/sponsor spot that looks like the rest of the page, you get Related questions, then you get other answers. So now you need to think to open the page.
If it tested the resistance i would be great.
I think this study is incomplete.
Since this study is based on a ratio of accidents vs sold car. Newer cars models have less idle car, helping the statistics of older car models/companies. Given that Tesla and other more price models, will use insurance for minors damage, do to the cost of reparation vs lost sales value.
At Codan, it is Kia’s electric cars that top the damage statistics, closely followed by Tesla’s and Hyundai’s electric cars. Richvoldsen emphasizes that it is Kia’s electric cars that top the list, and that the damage statistics do not apply to fossil fuel-powered Kia cars.
https://www.tu.no/artikler/tesla-har-92-prosent-oftere-skader-enn-fossilbiler-br/484354
Test out Play Sync for Lemmy works great.