• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    First, they sent the missionaries. They built communities, facilities for the common good, and spoke of collaboration and mutual prosperity. They got so many of us to buy into their belief system as a result.

    Then, they sent the conquistadors. They took what we had built under their guidance, and claimed we “weren’t using it” and it was rightfully theirs to begin with.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, they could just do what reddit does and restore from backup automatically lol

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    See, this is why we can’t have nice things. Money fucks it up, every time. Fuck money, it’s a shitty backwards idea. We can do better than this.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can be killed with steel, which has a lot of other implications on what you do in order to avoid getting killed with steel.

      Does steel fuck it all up?

      Centralization is a shitty backwards idea. But you have to be very conscious of yourself and your instincts to neuter the part that tells you that it’s not to understand it.

      Distributivism minus Catholicism is just so good. I always return to it when I give up on trying to find future in some other political ideology.

      • Hamartia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        List of Distributist parties in the UK:

        • National Distributist Party
        • British National Party
        • National Front

        Hmmm, maybe the Catholic part isn’t the only part worth reviewing.

        Also worth noting that the Conservative Party’s ‘Big Society’ schtick in 2010 was wrapped in the trappings of distributism.

        Not that all this diminishes it entirely but it does seem to be an entry drug for exploitation by the right.

        I gotta hold my hand up and state that I am not read up on it at all, so happy to be corrected. But my impression is that Pope Leo XIII’s conception was to reduce secular power so as to leave a void for the church to fill. And it’s the potential exploitation of that void that attracts the far right too.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          but it does seem to be an entry drug for exploitation by the right.

          Well, it is a right ideology. It can be that, of course.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Of leftist ideologies it’s the best one, but not as beautiful and overarching as distributivism.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Someone comes up with something good: look what I made, we can use this to better humanity!

      Corporations: How can we make money off of this?

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Every edit is reviewed by multiple people. If you have low karma, then your edit is reviewed before the edit gets applied to the current state of the database.

      Even with high karma, your edit still gets reviewed and will be reverted if it’s a bad edit.

      And any time an edit is reverted, that’s a knock against your account. There’s a requirement for all edits to improve the content you’re editing.

      … keep in mind Stack Overflow doesn’t just allow editing your own posts, you can edit any content on the website, similar to wikipedia.

      • catalog3115@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s a shame, only corporate are going to be benefiting from hard work & labour of so many talented people.

  • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    To vandolise your own work and to hopefully not get banned, make/edit your posts to include an ‘AI’ response, make it appear as being helpful and have the ‘AI’ say its catchphrases while its clearly malphunctioning. (creativity knob too high/low, poisoned like tay AI, invisable   (nbsp) marks in the middle of words or other unicode corruption like G̸͖̓l̸̠̓i̶̛͓t̸̞̑c̴̯͝h̷̝̾ ̷̨͒ṱ̴̃e̷̤̾x̸̟͊t̷̫͝, obvious programming flaws that makes code not compile, etc)

    Pretend the AI’s answer was useful and wink to the humans that its not.

    Also, I dont discredit @FJW@discuss.tchncs.de’s answer.

    … Frankly, the solution here isn’t vandalism, it’s setting up a competing side and copying the content over. …

    His is less childish. His is the way to move forward. Mine is looking back and ventimg steam.

    … Anything else is just playing around and hoping that a company acts against its own interests, which has rarely ever worked before. …

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Begun, the AI wars have.

    Faces on T-shirts, you must print print. Fake facts into old forum comments, you must edit. Poison the data well, you must.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Problem is, it still results in turning the Internet to shit. We just do it manually to preempt the AI doing it.

  • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You really don’t need anything near as complex as AI…a simple script could be configured to automatically close the issue as solved with a link to a randomly-selected unrelated issue.

  • FJW@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Frankly, the solution here isn’t vandalism, it’s setting up a competing side and copying the content over. The license of stackoverflow makes that explicitly legal. Anything else is just playing around and hoping that a company acts against its own interests, which has rarely ever worked before.

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The license of stackoverflow makes that explicitly legal

      How and why is it illegal (I will take down my post about vandlism until I discuss this.)

      • FJW@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not saying vandalism is illegal. I’m say that it borders on immoral and that there is a better, more radical (and thus effective) alternative that one might expect to be illegal but in fact isn’t.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The enshittification is very real and is spreading constantly. Companies will leech more from their employees and users until things start to break down. Acceleration is the only way.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s a terrible analogy, implying the wish that everyone on the plane dies if one engine fails.

        It’s like an airline company has been complete shit for decades, wanting to see them fail fast so that a better airline company can take their place.

  • tearsintherain@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Reddit/Stack/AI are the latest examples of an economic system where a few people monetize and get wealthy using the output of the very many.