• AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Interesting. As much as I’m a Foobar2000 fan, it’s not open source. Looks like I’ll be giving Winamp another spin soon.

  • HereToLurk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Finally! Couple weeks back I downloaded it again for the first time in probably 10 years and it really made me wonder why they basically fucked it up and abandoned it

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m still using Winamp 2.91. I’m just too used to it to change. Now, if someone added Flac support to the same interface, I’d be happy. And if someone ported it to Linux and Android, I’d pay big bucks for it.

  • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Still whipping the llama’s ass all these years later! So glad this one never died. Way too much time getting all my music tags right so everything would be formatted correctly in Winamp when I was young.

    • dumbass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Screw limewire, soulseek is the way, an endless sea of perfectly organised music libraries, you’ll find what you want and stuff you didn’t know you needed.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem is when they’re perfectly organised in a different manner from what you expect :D

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I organize them into

          Source (Bandcamp, Deezer, etc) --> Artist - Album --> Files

          It’s easy to navigate and makes handling multiple versions of the same album easy because they are seperated into source folders.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            For the files themselves lately I’ve been doing something like Country of Origin/Artist/Original Year - Album (Catalogue Number) (Release Year)/ (used to do it without the country, but at one point they became way too many, and I don’t really like organising by letter or whatever). I love foobar2000 with Facets because of the fact that you can shove any arbitrary tag into the files and then have columns show it (I’m doing that with the countries for example), but I’m now suffering a bit because of that habit - I started also self hosting my library and Navidrome that I’m using doesn’t like just any tags that you throw at it (it especially doesn’t like it if you have multiple releases of the same album that have come out in the same year).

              • kamen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                My view is that not having separate artist folders is wild, but hey, whatever works for you.

                All in all however specific folder structure is not terribly important to me; what’s important is that the tags are in order and that I can make the app I’m using present the stuff in the manner that I want.

                • Emerald@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Do you share music on p2p services or do you just have a personal collection? The reason people don’t like seperate artist folder is because when sharing the folder it won’t include the artist name.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Now I’m sad that it already has a name - I don’t get to name my diagnosis.

            /s

      • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thanks for this. I’d not heard of soulseek. I’m an *arr person with Usenet. It’ll be nice to see if I can find some rare / missing items.

        • Jamyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am a mildly net savvy person who only knows about torrents and file sharing. Can you point me to resources where I can learn more about Usenet? Also, what client and service do you use to access it? Thanks in advance.

          • Scrollone@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Unfortunately, R#ddit is still a great resource for that. Check out the /r/Piracy wiki.

            To summarize, Usenet is made up by servers that host all the “newsgroups”, but nowadays newsgroups are used to share files (like email attachments).

            You don’t need to know anything about Usenet itself, the things you need are three:

            • an indexer (they let you find nzb files, like torrent files)
            • a Usenet server subscription (where files are actually stored)
            • a client to download from that server (nzbget and SABnzbd are the two most used)

            Good luck!

          • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Trashguides is a good place for the arr applications.

            Tldr you’ll need a hoster, newshosting is what I use And an indexer drunkenslug is one I use. I have 6. Lol

            Indexer is the search that points to the files hosted on the hoster.

            Good luck!

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not sure what can be brought to Winamp that’ll make it better through open source. Maybe it’ll be a default alternative for Linux distros? That’d be cool.

    But, Winamp to me is just a program I use that plays video game soundtracks that are different formats aren’t MP3 or WAV. Like Super Nintendo with .SPC for example.

    AIMP has predominantly taken the mantle on my system as default media player, it’s just feature rich and long won me over the day my PC suddenly rebooted and the song I was playing was just on pause with that program! Winamp couldn’t do this, whenever I re-opened it, song stopped playing entirely, gotta play it again.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Its maybe a small thing, but being packaged in linux repos would be huge for me

      Being able to type

      $sudo apt install winamp

      Would be so cool

    • moon_matter@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are likely lots of improvements that can be made under the hood. I’m willing to bet that it depends on several aging libraries that could probably be swapped out for something better.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    First: Surprised it still exists.

    Second: More surprised there are Apple AppStore and Google PlayStore links on the bottom.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, I mean I loved Winamp, but streaming ease of use pretty much killed it. Even then, I’ve been Linux Desktop forever, and other options there with better network and non-file aware media management tools kinda took over. Would love to see them make it as extensible as VLC though, even just for the nostalgic purposes.