It is not necessary to kill any children.
Its called “collateral damage”.
During war, this is unavoidable.
During war with hamas, they go to great lengths to maximize this number to benefit their propaganda.
If you ask me, I would sacrifice every last one of them in order to eradicating hamas(Isis).
Western civilization/values are worth more than the children killed in the hands of hamas(Isis).
Now I will direct this question back at you,
What is the maximum number of children who need to die before hamas(Isis) surrender?
Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime. International humanitarian law and the Rome Statute permit belligerents to carry out proportionate attacks against military objectives,[17] even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur.
Also, if you want some more insight, he speakers from experience:
If you ask me, I would sacrifice every last one of them in order to eradicating hamas(Isis). Western civilization/values are worth more than the children killed in the hands of hamas(Isis).
I sincerely hope you aren’t a parent with that attitude about children.
Now I will direct this question back at you, What is the maximum number of children who need to die before hamas(Isis) surrender?
Zero. Israel should not kill one single child. If they can’t defeat Hamas without killing children, then maybe Hamas has a point.
That’s an interesting way to excuse virtually any war crime imaginable if Israel chooses to commit it. “It’s Hamas’ fault that Israel covered Gaza in anthrax spores, they’re the reason Israel did it.”
What is the maximum number of children who need to die before hamas(Isis) surrender?
“What is the maximum number of hostages police are allowed to kill before they negotiate with the bank robber?”
This isn’t a game where the IDF has to grind kids for XP before attacking a final boss, asshole. The answer is “as few as possible, ideally zero”, but the IDF has shown that they are either stupidly or maliciously indiscriminate in who they kill.
Max necessary? 0 What a moronic question.
It is not necessary to kill any children. Its called “collateral damage”. During war, this is unavoidable. During war with hamas, they go to great lengths to maximize this number to benefit their propaganda.
If you ask me, I would sacrifice every last one of them in order to eradicating hamas(Isis). Western civilization/values are worth more than the children killed in the hands of hamas(Isis).
Now I will direct this question back at you, What is the maximum number of children who need to die before hamas(Isis) surrender?
You can check ratio numbers here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_damage
Also, if you want some more insight, he speakers from experience:
https://youtu.be/pjOEJumoABg?si=KEzu1r6JmT8Wo6VM
https://youtu.be/UPomqJz-qYc?si=5StBo5m7vGIXwhoX
Oh, and don’t forget about hamas’s(Isis) baloney data.
https://fathomjournal.org/statistically-impossible-a-critical-analysis-of-hamass-women-and-children-casualty-figures/
I sincerely hope you aren’t a parent with that attitude about children.
Zero. Israel should not kill one single child. If they can’t defeat Hamas without killing children, then maybe Hamas has a point.
Amazing how hamas can go into Israel, murder children, then get asylum by hiding among its own children.
By your logic I can grab a couple of babies, shoot up school, and I should be untouchable as long as I have a baby vest?
Are you honestly suggesting that the IDF has absolutely no culpability when it comes to killing children? All dead children in Gaza are Hamas’ fault?
Because otherwise, you don’t understand what you are calling my logic.
Yes, the moment hamas started this war, they condemned the people of Gaza to a hellish decade or two.
So you’re saying that even if an IDF soldier shoots a child in the face, it’s Hamas’ fault? Really?
Yes, because hamas is the reason for this soldier being there.
That’s an interesting way to excuse virtually any war crime imaginable if Israel chooses to commit it. “It’s Hamas’ fault that Israel covered Gaza in anthrax spores, they’re the reason Israel did it.”
War crimes are crimes. If any happened, Israel will be held accountable.
But still, hamas are the ones who brought this on Gaza.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/pjOEJumoABg?si=KEzu1r6JmT8Wo6VM
https://piped.video/UPomqJz-qYc?si=5StBo5m7vGIXwhoX
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
“What is the maximum number of hostages police are allowed to kill before they negotiate with the bank robber?”
This isn’t a game where the IDF has to grind kids for XP before attacking a final boss, asshole. The answer is “as few as possible, ideally zero”, but the IDF has shown that they are either stupidly or maliciously indiscriminate in who they kill.
Obviously collateral damage is terrible, but it is a fact of war.
Hamas(Isis) go out of their way to inflate collateral damage. This should give them a free pass to do as they please?