• Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Intentionally biased socialized medicine, too. Imagine if you had to wait 10 months for abortion prescriptions.

        • Gigan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Great reasons the government shouldn’t be in charge of healthcare! Your options could change based on whatever party is in power

          • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The conservative government is trying to underfund and undermine the NHS so that people do switch to private healthcare and they don’t have to pay for it any more. And then they claim it wasn’t their fault, as people chose to switch. You’re helping them.

          • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            As opposed to the US model of arbitrarily changing based on your employer, or whatever plans they choose to sponsor for you for a given year? Oh yeah, that’s in addition to whatever party’s in power tinkering with availability/access (look at mifepristone for an example)

            What’s your point? “Your system isn’t perfect, reeeee!!!” Ok, and? How does this add anything, anything at all, to the conversation?

    • ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      yes access to medical care in the us is never infringed upon

      e.g. if you want a given medical procedure performed, there is no way for the state to stop you