Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.netexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.netWilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareSuavevillain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoMost of AI just seems to blatant theft and copyright issues.
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoAnd traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoNo, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it. When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThat’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for us, and we’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
Most of AI just seems to blatant theft and copyright issues.
And traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.
Not in this case.
No, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it.
When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
That’s pretty much the whole point.
Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people.
Just clearly define “copyright violation” for us, and we’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.