• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If that’s a night train, fuck the flight. I’d rather sleep on the train and wake up in a new city for 40$ than drive to the airport for an hour, wait on the plain for 1-2 hours, wait 30 minutes for take off, and then get an uber or something to the city center for another 20$. With a train you show up, sit down, and arrive in the center of the city where I want to be.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      i can see it being ok for overnight, actually. like, i’m not against the idea, it’s just that it services a narrower range of travel needs due to its long duration.

      i’m from NYC, so i’m perfectly happy with train travel, but 7 hours is a long-ass trip.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It may serve a narrower range of travel needs, but it’s worth noting that the reason that Amtrak added the Borealis train on the Twin Cities-to-Chicago route is the existing high customer demand for that segment on the Empire Builder train.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Look, I know im being critical, but I’m sure it will still have high ridership. If I still lived in Minneapolis, I’m sure I would probably take it.