• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Nuclear waste isnt that big of an issue.

      That part is kind of overblown.

      Hell, for nuclear waste from naval nuclear reactors, I’m pretty sure we still sell it to France. I know we did up to at least a decade ago. They just refine it again and keep using it.

      If it’s radioactive nuclear waste, that means it’s still radioactive.

      All you gotta do is get rid of the non radioactive bits and it’s fuel again. By the time you can’t do it anymore due to prohibitive cost to gain ratio, it’s not a big problem to get rid of it, because it’s not that radioactive

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean yeah…

          Because that part should be…

          I mean, statistically speaking I’m probably the only person that will see this thread that had the US government drop over six figures on teaching nuclear engineering…

          But feel to do some googling about reusing spent fuel to verify for yourself.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yes, because if you read their previous comment you’ll see their primary concern is the CO2 released by curing concrete that is the equivalent of running a coal plant for DOZENS of seconds.