• crawancon@lemm.ee
    2·
    1 month ago

    haha as If Ai was ever going to stop at laborious tasks.

    it was beating chess champions long before writing and art came into the picture…

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      2·
      1 month ago

      That feeling of dread when you blunder a piece against stockfish and it doesn’t even take it but instead pushes a random pawn. That’s when you know you’re really in the shit.

    • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldEnglish
      33·
      1 month ago

      Chess engines don’t use machine learning

      edit: ya know, I get why y’all would downvote my other comments but this one is just a fact.

      • weker01@feddit.de
        1·
        1 month ago

        This is just wrong. Yes they do.

        Take stockfish for example. It’s probably the most well known engine. It uses specialized neural networks to evaluate board positions.

      • crawancon@lemm.ee
        33·
        1 month ago

        regardless of the backend mechanism of the particular Ai, it was still always going to encroach on multiple disciplines.

        maybe robots can do dishes but Ai is more than a robot.